<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Xie K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a worldwide disease. VDD is also associated with an increased risk of HIV-related comorbidities and mortality, and patients have a tendency to develop active tuberculosis compared to those with latent tuberculosis infection. Vitamin D supplementation may modulate HIV replication, improve TB inflammation and reduce progression of HIV-TB co-infection.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We meta-analyzed individual participant data from cohort studies, cross-sectional study, and RCTs of vitamin D in HIV group, TB group, and HIV-TB group. The primary outcomes were differences in vitamin D level and VDD prevalence between three groups, the secondary outcomes were CD4 count, HIV viral load, time to sputum smear conversion, time to culture conversion, relapse, morality, and TB score.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>For vitamin D levels, the overall mean difference (MD) between HIV group and TB group was -0.21 (95% CI, -20.80-20.38; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.9, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 84%), HIV group and HIV-TB group was 0.87 (95% CI, -11.45-13.20; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.89, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 87%), and TB group and HIV-TB group was 1.17 (95% CI, -5.21-7.55; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.72, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 85%). For vitamin D deficiency prevalence, the overall odds ratio (OR) for HIV group versus TB group was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.46-3.31; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.68; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 70%), HIV group versus HIV-TB group was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.03-2.29; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.04; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0%), and TB group versus HIV-TB group was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.61-1.20; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.36; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 22%). In HIV-TB group, the overall OR for vitamin D group versus placebo group was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.34-1.67; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.52; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 60%).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our findings indicated that there were no variations in vitamin D levels between three groups. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was higher in the HIV-TB group than in the HIV group. Additionally, the administration of vitamin D supplements did not have obvious impact on CD4 count and viral load. Likewise, vitamin D had no effect on time to sputum smear conversion, time to culture conversion, relapse, 12-month morality, and TB score.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in public health</journal><pagination>1344024</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10910524</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Association of vitamin D with HIV infected individuals, TB infected individuals, and HIV-TB co-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10910524</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Li Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ji J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Association of vitamin D with HIV infected individuals, TB infected individuals, and HIV-TB co-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a worldwide disease. VDD is also associated with an increased risk of HIV-related comorbidities and mortality, and patients have a tendency to develop active tuberculosis compared to those with latent tuberculosis infection. Vitamin D supplementation may modulate HIV replication, improve TB inflammation and reduce progression of HIV-TB co-infection.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We meta-analyzed individual participant data from cohort studies, cross-sectional study, and RCTs of vitamin D in HIV group, TB group, and HIV-TB group. The primary outcomes were differences in vitamin D level and VDD prevalence between three groups, the secondary outcomes were CD4 count, HIV viral load, time to sputum smear conversion, time to culture conversion, relapse, morality, and TB score.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>For vitamin D levels, the overall mean difference (MD) between HIV group and TB group was -0.21 (95% CI, -20.80-20.38; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.9, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 84%), HIV group and HIV-TB group was 0.87 (95% CI, -11.45-13.20; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.89, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 87%), and TB group and HIV-TB group was 1.17 (95% CI, -5.21-7.55; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.72, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 85%). For vitamin D deficiency prevalence, the overall odds ratio (OR) for HIV group versus TB group was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.46-3.31; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.68; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 70%), HIV group versus HIV-TB group was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.03-2.29; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.04; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0%), and TB group versus HIV-TB group was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.61-1.20; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.36; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 22%). In HIV-TB group, the overall OR for vitamin D group versus placebo group was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.34-1.67; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.52; &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 60%).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our findings indicated that there were no variations in vitamin D levels between three groups. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was higher in the HIV-TB group than in the HIV group. Additionally, the administration of vitamin D supplements did not have obvious impact on CD4 count and viral load. Likewise, vitamin D had no effect on time to sputum smear conversion, time to culture conversion, relapse, 12-month morality, and TB score.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2025-04-26T22:34:37.761Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T17:14:35.61Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10910524</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38439754</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344024</doi></cross_references></HashMap>