<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2</volume><submitter>Garland A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Prediction of future critical illness could render it practical to test interventions seeking to avoid or delay the coming event.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Identify adults having >33% probability of near-future critical illness.&lt;h4>Research design&lt;/h4>Retrospective cohort study, 2013-2015.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Community-dwelling residents of Manitoba, Canada, aged 40-89 years.&lt;h4>Measures&lt;/h4>The outcome was a near-future critical illness, defined as intensive care unit admission with invasive mechanical ventilation, or non-palliative death occurring 30-180 days after 1 April each year. By dividing the data into training and test cohorts, a Classification and Regression Tree analysis was used to identify subgroups with ≥33% probability of the outcome. We considered 72 predictors including sociodemographics, chronic conditions, frailty, and health care utilization. Sensitivity analysis used logistic regression methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Approximately 0.38% of each yearly cohort experienced near-future critical illness. The optimal Tree identified 2,644 mutually exclusive subgroups. Socioeconomic status was the most influential variable, followed by nursing home residency and frailty; age was sixth. In the training data, the model performed well; 41 subgroups containing 493 subjects had ≥33% members who developed the outcome. However, in the test data, those subgroups contained 429 individuals, with 20 (4.7%) experiencing the outcome, which comprised 0.98% of all subjects with the outcome. While logistic regression showed less model overfitting, it likewise failed to achieve the stated objective.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>High-fidelity prediction of near-future critical illness among community-dwelling adults was not successful using population-based administrative data. Additional research is needed to ascertain whether the inclusion of additional types of data can achieve this goal.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in epidemiology</journal><pagination>944216</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10910992</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Administrative Data Is Insufficient to Identify Near-Future Critical Illness: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10910992</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Marrie RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wunsch H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chateau D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garland A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yogendran M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Administrative Data Is Insufficient to Identify Near-Future Critical Illness: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Prediction of future critical illness could render it practical to test interventions seeking to avoid or delay the coming event.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Identify adults having >33% probability of near-future critical illness.&lt;h4>Research design&lt;/h4>Retrospective cohort study, 2013-2015.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Community-dwelling residents of Manitoba, Canada, aged 40-89 years.&lt;h4>Measures&lt;/h4>The outcome was a near-future critical illness, defined as intensive care unit admission with invasive mechanical ventilation, or non-palliative death occurring 30-180 days after 1 April each year. By dividing the data into training and test cohorts, a Classification and Regression Tree analysis was used to identify subgroups with ≥33% probability of the outcome. We considered 72 predictors including sociodemographics, chronic conditions, frailty, and health care utilization. Sensitivity analysis used logistic regression methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Approximately 0.38% of each yearly cohort experienced near-future critical illness. The optimal Tree identified 2,644 mutually exclusive subgroups. Socioeconomic status was the most influential variable, followed by nursing home residency and frailty; age was sixth. In the training data, the model performed well; 41 subgroups containing 493 subjects had ≥33% members who developed the outcome. However, in the test data, those subgroups contained 429 individuals, with 20 (4.7%) experiencing the outcome, which comprised 0.98% of all subjects with the outcome. While logistic regression showed less model overfitting, it likewise failed to achieve the stated objective.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>High-fidelity prediction of near-future critical illness among community-dwelling adults was not successful using population-based administrative data. Additional research is needed to ascertain whether the inclusion of additional types of data can achieve this goal.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:34:33.096Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:34:33.096Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10910992</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38455278</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fepid.2022.944216</doi></cross_references></HashMap>