<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(1)</volume><submitter>Abraham J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4> Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from medical/surgical floors and increased boarding times of ICU patients in the emergency department (ED) are common; approximately half of these are associated with adverse events. We explore the potential role of a tele-critical care consult service (TC3) in managing critically ill patients outside of the ICU and potentially preventing low-acuity unplanned admissions and also investigate its design and implementation needs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4&gt; We conducted a qualitative study involving general observations of the units, shadowing of clinicians during patient transfers, and interviews with clinicians from the ED, medical/surgical floor units and their ICU counterparts, tele-ICU, and the rapid response team at a large academic medical center in St. Louis, Missouri, United States. We used a hybrid thematic analysis approach supported by open and structured coding using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4> Over 165 hours of observations/shadowing and 26 clinician interviews were conducted. Our findings suggest that a tele-critical care consult (TC3) service can prevent avoidable, lower acuity ICU admissions by offering a second set of eyes via remote monitoring and providing guidance to bedside and rapid response teams in the care delivery of these patients on the floor/ED. CFIR-informed enablers impacting the successful implementation of the TC3 service included the optional and on-demand features of the TC3 service, around-the-clock availability, and continuous access to trained critical care clinicians for avoidable lower acuity (ALA) patients outside of the ICU, familiarity with tele-ICU staff, and a willingness to try alternative patient risk mitigation strategies for ALA patients (suggested by TC3), before transferring all unplanned admissions to ICUs. Conversely, the CFIR-informed barriers to implementation included a desire to uphold physician autonomy by floor/ED clinicians, potential role conflicts with rapid response teams, additional workload for floor/ED nurses, concerns about obstructing unavoidable, higher acuity admissions, and discomfort with audio-visual tools. To amplify these potential enablers and mitigate potential barriers to TC3 implementation, informed by this study, we propose &lt;i>two key characteristics-&lt;/i>essential for extending the delivery of critical care services beyond the ICU&lt;i>-&lt;/i>underlying a telemedicine critical care consultation model including its &lt;i>virtual footprint&lt;/i> and &lt;i>on-demand and optional&lt;/i> service features.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4> Tele-critical care represents an innovative strategy for delivering safe and high-quality critical care services to lower acuity borderline patients outside the ICU setting.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Applied clinical informatics</journal><pagination>178-191</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10917611</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Expanding Critical Care Delivery beyond the Intensive Care Unit: Determining the Design and Implementation Needs for a Tele-Critical Care Consultation Service.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10917611</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Konzen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>White J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palmer C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abraham J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kandasamy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drewry A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fritz B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Expanding Critical Care Delivery beyond the Intensive Care Unit: Determining the Design and Implementation Needs for a Tele-Critical Care Consultation Service.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4> Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from medical/surgical floors and increased boarding times of ICU patients in the emergency department (ED) are common; approximately half of these are associated with adverse events. We explore the potential role of a tele-critical care consult service (TC3) in managing critically ill patients outside of the ICU and potentially preventing low-acuity unplanned admissions and also investigate its design and implementation needs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4&gt; We conducted a qualitative study involving general observations of the units, shadowing of clinicians during patient transfers, and interviews with clinicians from the ED, medical/surgical floor units and their ICU counterparts, tele-ICU, and the rapid response team at a large academic medical center in St. Louis, Missouri, United States. We used a hybrid thematic analysis approach supported by open and structured coding using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4> Over 165 hours of observations/shadowing and 26 clinician interviews were conducted. Our findings suggest that a tele-critical care consult (TC3) service can prevent avoidable, lower acuity ICU admissions by offering a second set of eyes via remote monitoring and providing guidance to bedside and rapid response teams in the care delivery of these patients on the floor/ED. CFIR-informed enablers impacting the successful implementation of the TC3 service included the optional and on-demand features of the TC3 service, around-the-clock availability, and continuous access to trained critical care clinicians for avoidable lower acuity (ALA) patients outside of the ICU, familiarity with tele-ICU staff, and a willingness to try alternative patient risk mitigation strategies for ALA patients (suggested by TC3), before transferring all unplanned admissions to ICUs. Conversely, the CFIR-informed barriers to implementation included a desire to uphold physician autonomy by floor/ED clinicians, potential role conflicts with rapid response teams, additional workload for floor/ED nurses, concerns about obstructing unavoidable, higher acuity admissions, and discomfort with audio-visual tools. To amplify these potential enablers and mitigate potential barriers to TC3 implementation, informed by this study, we propose &lt;i>two key characteristics-&lt;/i>essential for extending the delivery of critical care services beyond the ICU&lt;i>-&lt;/i>underlying a telemedicine critical care consultation model including its &lt;i>virtual footprint&lt;/i> and &lt;i>on-demand and optional&lt;/i> service features.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4> Tele-critical care represents an innovative strategy for delivering safe and high-quality critical care services to lower acuity borderline patients outside the ICU setting.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-03T23:35:52.034Z</modification><creation>2025-04-03T23:35:52.034Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10917611</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38447966</pubmed><doi>10.1055/s-0044-1780508</doi></cross_references></HashMap>