<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(3)</volume><submitter>Suzuki S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>&lt;i>Background:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) using the sinus rhythm ECG (SR-ECG). However, the diagnostic performance of the CNN model based on different ECG leads remains unclear. &lt;b>&lt;i>Methods and Results:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> In this retrospective analysis of a single-center, prospective cohort study, we identified 616 AF cases and 3,412 SR cases for the modeling dataset among new patients (n=19,170). The modeling dataset included SR-ECGs obtained within 31 days from AF-ECGs in AF cases and SR cases with follow-up ≥1,095 days. We evaluated the CNN model's performance for AF detection using 8-lead (I, II, and V1-6), single-lead, and double-lead ECGs through 5-fold cross-validation. The CNN model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856-0.888) and an odds ratio of 15.24 (95% CI: 12.42-18.72) for AF detection using the eight-lead ECG. Among the single-lead and double-lead ECGs, the double-lead ECG using leads I and V1 yielded an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.856-0.886) with an odds ratio of 14.34 (95% CI: 11.64-17.67). &lt;b>&lt;i>Conclusions:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> We assessed the performance of a CNN model for detecting AF using eight-lead, single-lead, and double-lead SR-ECGs. The model's performance with a double-lead (I, V1) ECG was comparable to that of the 8-lead ECG, suggesting its potential as an alternative for AF screening using SR-ECG.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Circulation reports</journal><pagination>46-54</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10920024</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Lead-Specific Performance for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Convolutional Neural Network Models Using Sinus Rhythm Electrocardiography.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10920024</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Suzuki S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arita T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kato Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iida M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uejima T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oikawa Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirota N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yajima J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Motogi J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kishi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Satoh K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hyodo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takayanagi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsuno S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Semba H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamashita T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakai H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsuzawa W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kano H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hori T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yagi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otsuka T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsuhama M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Umemoto T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Lead-Specific Performance for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Convolutional Neural Network Models Using Sinus Rhythm Electrocardiography.</name><description>&lt;b>&lt;i>Background:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) using the sinus rhythm ECG (SR-ECG). However, the diagnostic performance of the CNN model based on different ECG leads remains unclear. &lt;b>&lt;i>Methods and Results:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> In this retrospective analysis of a single-center, prospective cohort study, we identified 616 AF cases and 3,412 SR cases for the modeling dataset among new patients (n=19,170). The modeling dataset included SR-ECGs obtained within 31 days from AF-ECGs in AF cases and SR cases with follow-up ≥1,095 days. We evaluated the CNN model's performance for AF detection using 8-lead (I, II, and V1-6), single-lead, and double-lead ECGs through 5-fold cross-validation. The CNN model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856-0.888) and an odds ratio of 15.24 (95% CI: 12.42-18.72) for AF detection using the eight-lead ECG. Among the single-lead and double-lead ECGs, the double-lead ECG using leads I and V1 yielded an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.856-0.886) with an odds ratio of 14.34 (95% CI: 11.64-17.67). &lt;b>&lt;i>Conclusions:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> We assessed the performance of a CNN model for detecting AF using eight-lead, single-lead, and double-lead SR-ECGs. The model's performance with a double-lead (I, V1) ECG was comparable to that of the 8-lead ECG, suggesting its potential as an alternative for AF screening using SR-ECG.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:58:34.287Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:58:34.287Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10920024</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38464990</pubmed><doi>10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0068</doi></cross_references></HashMap>