<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shen AS</submitter><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>103838</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10922787</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>45</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a safe, non-mutagenic, and non-scarring treatment for actinic keratoses (AK).&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>'Painless' photodynamic therapy (p-PDT) is a regimen for AK that employs simultaneous aminolevulinate incubation and blue light illumination. The efficacy of p-PDT resembles that of traditional PDT, but detailed mechanisms of action for p-PDT are not well understood.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To characterize the inflammatory effects of the p-PDT procedure 48 h following treatment and determine the association of inflammation with precancer burden, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients with AK of face or scalp treated with p-PDT between 2017 and 2019. Patients self-reported their side effects 48 h following p-PDT and took photographs of their face and scalp. Photographs were edited to define seven anatomic regions, and erythema was scored by four investigators.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Ninety-eight patients provided photographs suitable for erythema evaluation. Most patients experienced 2 or more side effects and some pain 48 h post-procedure. Females experienced more pain (p = 0.01) and side effects (p = 0.002) compared to males. AK burden was positively associated with post p-PDT erythema response (p &lt; 0.0001) at all sites, but particularly in the temples (p = 0.002) and supralabial area (p = 0.009).&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>This study confirms a strong clinical inflammatory response after p-PDT. Severity of inflammation is positively associated with AK tumor burden, suggesting that post-treatment inflammation may be a pre-requisite for p-PDT efficacy. Interestingly, the results also identify certain gender-related differences in the severity of side effects experienced by patients post-PDT.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</journal><pubmed_title>Painless photodynamic therapy for facial actinic keratoses: A retrospective cohort study of the post-treatment inflammatory response.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10922787</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P01 CA084203</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA204158</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Nowacki AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Updyke A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warren CB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maytin EV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shen AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heusinkveld LE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Painless photodynamic therapy for facial actinic keratoses: A retrospective cohort study of the post-treatment inflammatory response.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a safe, non-mutagenic, and non-scarring treatment for actinic keratoses (AK).&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>'Painless' photodynamic therapy (p-PDT) is a regimen for AK that employs simultaneous aminolevulinate incubation and blue light illumination. The efficacy of p-PDT resembles that of traditional PDT, but detailed mechanisms of action for p-PDT are not well understood.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To characterize the inflammatory effects of the p-PDT procedure 48 h following treatment and determine the association of inflammation with precancer burden, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients with AK of face or scalp treated with p-PDT between 2017 and 2019. Patients self-reported their side effects 48 h following p-PDT and took photographs of their face and scalp. Photographs were edited to define seven anatomic regions, and erythema was scored by four investigators.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Ninety-eight patients provided photographs suitable for erythema evaluation. Most patients experienced 2 or more side effects and some pain 48 h post-procedure. Females experienced more pain (p = 0.01) and side effects (p = 0.002) compared to males. AK burden was positively associated with post p-PDT erythema response (p &lt; 0.0001) at all sites, but particularly in the temples (p = 0.002) and supralabial area (p = 0.009).&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>This study confirms a strong clinical inflammatory response after p-PDT. Severity of inflammation is positively associated with AK tumor burden, suggesting that post-treatment inflammation may be a pre-requisite for p-PDT efficacy. Interestingly, the results also identify certain gender-related differences in the severity of side effects experienced by patients post-PDT.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:51:04.867Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:51:04.867Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10922787</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37844787</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103838</doi></cross_references></HashMap>