<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>57(2)</volume><submitter>Shin K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are widely employed as a therapeutic option for end-stage heart failure. We evaluated the outcomes associated with centrifugal-flow LVAD implantation, comparing 2 device models: the Heartmate 3 (HM3) and the Heartware Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data were collected from patients who underwent LVAD implantation between June 1, 2015 and December 31, 2022. We analyzed overall survival, first rehospitalization, and early, late, and LVAD-related complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In total, 74 patients underwent LVAD implantation, with 42 receiving the HM3 and 32 the HVAD. A mild Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support score was more common among HM3 than HVAD recipients (p=0.006), and patients receiving the HM3 exhibited lower rates of preoperative ventilator use (p=0.010) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p=0.039). The overall early mortality rate was 5.4% (4 of 74 patients), with no significant difference between groups. Regarding early right ventricular (RV) failure, HM3 implantation was associated with a lower rate (13 of 42 [31.0%]) than HVAD implantation (18 of 32 [56.2%], p=0.051). The median rehospitalization-free period was longer for HM3 recipients (16.9 months) than HVAD recipients (5.3 months, p=0.013). Furthermore, HM3 recipients displayed a lower incidence of late hemorrhagic stroke (p=0.016). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative use of continuous renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 22.31; p=0.002) was the only significant predictor of postoperative RV failure.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The LVAD models (HM3 and HVAD) demonstrated comparable overall survival rates. However, the HM3 was associated with a lower risk of late hemorrhagic stroke.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of chest surgery</journal><pagination>184-194</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10927433</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Surgical Outcomes of Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Heartmate 3 versus Heartware Ventricular Assist Device.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10927433</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jung SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cho WC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim HR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Surgical Outcomes of Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Heartmate 3 versus Heartware Ventricular Assist Device.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are widely employed as a therapeutic option for end-stage heart failure. We evaluated the outcomes associated with centrifugal-flow LVAD implantation, comparing 2 device models: the Heartmate 3 (HM3) and the Heartware Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data were collected from patients who underwent LVAD implantation between June 1, 2015 and December 31, 2022. We analyzed overall survival, first rehospitalization, and early, late, and LVAD-related complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In total, 74 patients underwent LVAD implantation, with 42 receiving the HM3 and 32 the HVAD. A mild Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support score was more common among HM3 than HVAD recipients (p=0.006), and patients receiving the HM3 exhibited lower rates of preoperative ventilator use (p=0.010) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p=0.039). The overall early mortality rate was 5.4% (4 of 74 patients), with no significant difference between groups. Regarding early right ventricular (RV) failure, HM3 implantation was associated with a lower rate (13 of 42 [31.0%]) than HVAD implantation (18 of 32 [56.2%], p=0.051). The median rehospitalization-free period was longer for HM3 recipients (16.9 months) than HVAD recipients (5.3 months, p=0.013). Furthermore, HM3 recipients displayed a lower incidence of late hemorrhagic stroke (p=0.016). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative use of continuous renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 22.31; p=0.002) was the only significant predictor of postoperative RV failure.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The LVAD models (HM3 and HVAD) demonstrated comparable overall survival rates. However, the HM3 was associated with a lower risk of late hemorrhagic stroke.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T21:30:53.946Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T21:30:53.946Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10927433</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38360679</pubmed><doi>10.5090/jcs.23.135</doi></cross_references></HashMap>