<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>78(3)</volume><submitter>Baart AM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Dietary indices are useful measures to investigate associations between dietary intake and disease development. The Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD2015-index), a measure of diet quality, assesses adherence to the 2015 Dutch dietary guidelines. We assessed the DHD2015-index in the Lifelines cohort study, and compared calculations from basic and detailed dietary intake data. This article replaces the retracted article that was published on 16 May 2022 [1].&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Dietary intake was assessed with a specially developed Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) called Flower-FFQ, which consists of one main questionnaire (heart-FFQ), which asks for intakes of major food groups, and three complementary questionnaires (petal-FFQs), which ask for detailed information on food types within major food groups of the heart-FFQ. The DHD2015-index was assessed using data from the total Flower-FFQ (for 56,982 participants), and using data from the heart-FFQ only (for 129,030 participants). Agreement between the two indices was assessed with correlation and cross-classification.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The median (25th-75th percentile) DHD2015-index score was 75 (65-85) for men and 81 (70-91) for women based on the Flower-FFQ, and 68 (58-77) for men and 73 (63-82) for women based on the heart-FFQ. The Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.67 for men and 0.66 for women. Cross-classification into quartiles of the DHD2015-index showed that 59-60% of participants were classified in the same quartile, 36-37% in the adjacent, and 4% in the non-adjacent.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Dietary data from the Flower-FFQ provide the most optimal information to assess the DHD2015-index. However, the DHD2015-index from the heart-FFQ showed good agreement with the index from the Flower-FFQ of ranking participants according to diet quality, and can be used when the DHD2015 index from the Flower-FFQ is not available.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of clinical nutrition</journal><pagination>217-227</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10927538</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10927538</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Baart AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Vries JHM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feskens EJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brouwer-Brolsma EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Jong HBT</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Dietary indices are useful measures to investigate associations between dietary intake and disease development. The Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD2015-index), a measure of diet quality, assesses adherence to the 2015 Dutch dietary guidelines. We assessed the DHD2015-index in the Lifelines cohort study, and compared calculations from basic and detailed dietary intake data. This article replaces the retracted article that was published on 16 May 2022 [1].&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Dietary intake was assessed with a specially developed Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) called Flower-FFQ, which consists of one main questionnaire (heart-FFQ), which asks for intakes of major food groups, and three complementary questionnaires (petal-FFQs), which ask for detailed information on food types within major food groups of the heart-FFQ. The DHD2015-index was assessed using data from the total Flower-FFQ (for 56,982 participants), and using data from the heart-FFQ only (for 129,030 participants). Agreement between the two indices was assessed with correlation and cross-classification.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The median (25th-75th percentile) DHD2015-index score was 75 (65-85) for men and 81 (70-91) for women based on the Flower-FFQ, and 68 (58-77) for men and 73 (63-82) for women based on the heart-FFQ. The Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.67 for men and 0.66 for women. Cross-classification into quartiles of the DHD2015-index showed that 59-60% of participants were classified in the same quartile, 36-37% in the adjacent, and 4% in the non-adjacent.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Dietary data from the Flower-FFQ provide the most optimal information to assess the DHD2015-index. However, the DHD2015-index from the heart-FFQ showed good agreement with the index from the Flower-FFQ of ranking participants according to diet quality, and can be used when the DHD2015 index from the Flower-FFQ is not available.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2024-12-04T05:20:01.074Z</modification><creation>2024-12-04T05:20:01.074Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10927538</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38017142</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41430-023-01372-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>