<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15</volume><submitter>Bandara AY</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;i>Trichoderma&lt;/i> spp. are widely used to enhance crop growth and suppress diverse diseases. However, inconsistent field efficacy remains a major barrier to their use as a reliable alternative to synthetic pesticides. Various strategies have been investigated to enhance the robustness of their application. Here, we evaluated how &lt;i>T. virens&lt;/i> application methods (pre-, at-, and post-transplant) affect the growth of two tomato varieties and their rhizosphere fungal and bacterial communities. Although the greatest rhizosphere abundance of &lt;i>T. virens&lt;/i> was observed in the post-transplant application, the at-transplant application promoted tomato growth the most, indicating that greater rhizosphere abundance does not necessarily result in better tomato growth. None of the application m</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in microbiology</journal><pagination>1366690</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10929717</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>&lt;i>Trichoderma&lt;/i> application methods differentially affect the tomato growth, rhizomicrobiome, and rhizosphere soil suppressiveness against &lt;i>Fusarium oxysporum&lt;/i>.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10929717</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bandara AY</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>&lt;i>Trichoderma&lt;/i> application methods differentially affect the tomato growth, rhizomicrobiome, and rhizosphere soil suppressiveness against &lt;i>Fusarium oxysporum&lt;/i>.</name><description>&lt;i>Trichoderma&lt;/i> spp. are widely used to enhance crop growth and suppress diverse diseases. However, inconsistent field efficacy remains a major barrier to their use as a reliable alternative to synthetic pesticides. Various strategies have been investigated to enhance the robustness of their application. Here, we evaluated how &lt;i>T. virens&lt;/i> application methods (pre-, at-, and post-transplant) affect the growth of two tomato varieties and their rhizosphere fungal and bacterial communities. Although the greatest rhizosphere abundance of &lt;i>T. virens&lt;/i> was observed in the post-transplant application, the at-transplant application promoted tomato growth the most, indicating that greater rhizosphere abundance does not necessarily result in better tomato growth. None of the application m</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-07-14T23:49:41.321Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T14:32:31.209Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10929717</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38476947</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2024.1366690</doi></cross_references></HashMap>