<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><submitter>Ranieri V</submitter><funding>Sir Bobby Charlton Foundation</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study examined perceptions of coercion, pressures and procedural injustice and how such perceptions influenced psychological well-being in those who experienced a UK COVID-19 lockdown, with a view to preparing for the possibility of future lockdowns.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>40 individuals categorised as perceiving the lockdown(s) as either highly or lowly coercive took part in one of six asynchronous virtual focus groups (AVFGs).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Using thematic analysis, the following key themes were identified in participants' discussions: (1) Choice, control and freedom; (2) threats; (3) fairness; (4) circumstantial factors; and (5) psychological factors.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As the first qualitative study to investigate the psychological construct of perceived coercion in rel</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC public health</journal><pagination>793</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10938678</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Pandemic lockdowns: who feels coerced and why? - a study on perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice during the UK COVID-19 lockdowns.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10938678</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Edwards SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ranieri V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gordon C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamboj SK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Pandemic lockdowns: who feels coerced and why? - a study on perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice during the UK COVID-19 lockdowns.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study examined perceptions of coercion, pressures and procedural injustice and how such perceptions influenced psychological well-being in those who experienced a UK COVID-19 lockdown, with a view to preparing for the possibility of future lockdowns.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>40 individuals categorised as perceiving the lockdown(s) as either highly or lowly coercive took part in one of six asynchronous virtual focus groups (AVFGs).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Using thematic analysis, the following key themes were identified in participants' discussions: (1) Choice, control and freedom; (2) threats; (3) fairness; (4) circumstantial factors; and (5) psychological factors.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As the first qualitative study to investigate the psychological construct of perceived coercion in rel</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-07-15T00:37:55.404Z</modification><creation>2026-06-27T03:05:09.63Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10938678</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38481190</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12889-024-17985-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>