<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><submitter>Kang MT</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is used for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Patchy chorioretinal atrophy (pCRA) enlargement has been reported in mCNV cases associated with vision loss. Our aim was to compare the long-term effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy alone versus anti-VEGF followed by posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) in controlling myopic maculopathy in mCNV eyes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 95 high myopia patients (refractive error ≥ 6.00 diopters, axial length ≥ 26.0 mm) with mCNV. Patients were treated with anti-VEGF alone (group A) or anti-VEGF followed by PSR (group B). The following data were collected: refractive error, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic fundus examination, ocular coherence tomography and ocular biometry at 12 and 24 months pre- and postoperatively. The primary outcomes were changes in pCRA and BCVA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In 26 eyes of 24 patients, the mean pCRA size significantly increased from baseline (0.88 ± 1.69 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) to 12 months (1.57 ± 2.32 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, t = 3.249, P = 0.003) and 24 months (2.17 ± 2.79 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, t = 3.965, P = 0.001) postoperatively. The increase in perilesional pCRA in group B (n = 12) was 98.2% and 94.2% smaller than that in group A (n = 14) at 12 and 24 months (Beta 0.57 [95% CI 0.01, 191 1.13], P = 0.048). In group B, 7 eyes (58.3%) gained more than 2 lines of BCVA compared with only 4 eyes (28.6%) in group A at 24 months.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Anti-VEGF therapy followed by PSR achieved better outcomes than anti-VEGF therapy alone in controlling the development of myopic maculopathy in mCNV and may constitute a better treatment option by securing a better long-term VA outcome.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC ophthalmology</journal><pagination>118</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10938773</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy with and without posterior scleral reinforcement on myopic maculopathy in myopic choroidal neovascularization eyes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10938773</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tian J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yusufu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu W</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy with and without posterior scleral reinforcement on myopic maculopathy in myopic choroidal neovascularization eyes.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is used for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Patchy chorioretinal atrophy (pCRA) enlargement has been reported in mCNV cases associated with vision loss. Our aim was to compare the long-term effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy alone versus anti-VEGF followed by posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) in controlling myopic maculopathy in mCNV eyes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 95 high myopia patients (refractive error ≥ 6.00 diopters, axial length ≥ 26.0 mm) with mCNV. Patients were treated with anti-VEGF alone (group A) or anti-VEGF followed by PSR (group B). The following data were collected: refractive error, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic fundus examination, ocular coherence tomography and ocular biometry at 12 and 24 months pre- and postoperatively. The primary outcomes were changes in pCRA and BCVA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In 26 eyes of 24 patients, the mean pCRA size significantly increased from baseline (0.88 ± 1.69 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) to 12 months (1.57 ± 2.32 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, t = 3.249, P = 0.003) and 24 months (2.17 ± 2.79 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, t = 3.965, P = 0.001) postoperatively. The increase in perilesional pCRA in group B (n = 12) was 98.2% and 94.2% smaller than that in group A (n = 14) at 12 and 24 months (Beta 0.57 [95% CI 0.01, 191 1.13], P = 0.048). In group B, 7 eyes (58.3%) gained more than 2 lines of BCVA compared with only 4 eyes (28.6%) in group A at 24 months.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Anti-VEGF therapy followed by PSR achieved better outcomes than anti-VEGF therapy alone in controlling the development of myopic maculopathy in mCNV and may constitute a better treatment option by securing a better long-term VA outcome.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-24T03:11:05.734Z</modification><creation>2026-06-24T03:06:53.481Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10938773</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38481176</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12886-024-03357-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>