<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(1)</volume><submitter>Pavlova M</submitter><funding>Alberta Children&amp;apos;s Hospital Research Institute</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sensitivity to pain traumatization is defined as the propensity to develop cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to pain that resemble a traumatic stress reaction. To date, sensitivity to pain traumatization has been assessed in adults (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale [SPTS-12]) and parents of youth with chronic pain (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Parent version [SPTS-P]). SPT may be relevant in the context of pediatric chronic pain given the substantial comorbidity between posttraumatic stress symptoms and pain.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This prospective study aimed to adapt the SPTS-12 for use in youth and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the new scale.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants included 175 youth with chronic pain (&lt;i>M&lt;/i>&lt;sub>age&lt;/sub> = 14.31 years, 73% girls) referred to outpatient chronic pain programs. At baseline, youth self-reported the levels of their sensitivity to pain traumatization (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Child version [SPTS-C]), as well as their pain symptoms, pain-related anxiety, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and attentional control. Three months later, youth self-reported their pain symptoms and completed the SPTS-C.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The SPTS-C had a one-factor structure that explained 48% of variance and demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. SPTS-C baseline scores predicted follow-up levels of pain interference but not pain intensity or pain unpleasantness.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric properties of the SPTS-C and the potential role of SPT in pediatric chronic pain outcomes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur</journal><pagination>2298769</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939150</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Child Version (SPTS-C): Development and preliminary validation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10939150</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Noel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pavlova M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salomons TV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maunder L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beveridge JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soltani S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katz J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Child Version (SPTS-C): Development and preliminary validation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sensitivity to pain traumatization is defined as the propensity to develop cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to pain that resemble a traumatic stress reaction. To date, sensitivity to pain traumatization has been assessed in adults (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale [SPTS-12]) and parents of youth with chronic pain (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Parent version [SPTS-P]). SPT may be relevant in the context of pediatric chronic pain given the substantial comorbidity between posttraumatic stress symptoms and pain.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This prospective study aimed to adapt the SPTS-12 for use in youth and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the new scale.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants included 175 youth with chronic pain (&lt;i>M&lt;/i>&lt;sub>age&lt;/sub> = 14.31 years, 73% girls) referred to outpatient chronic pain programs. At baseline, youth self-reported the levels of their sensitivity to pain traumatization (Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization Scale-Child version [SPTS-C]), as well as their pain symptoms, pain-related anxiety, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and attentional control. Three months later, youth self-reported their pain symptoms and completed the SPTS-C.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The SPTS-C had a one-factor structure that explained 48% of variance and demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. SPTS-C baseline scores predicted follow-up levels of pain interference but not pain intensity or pain unpleasantness.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The results provide preliminary evidence for the psychometric properties of the SPTS-C and the potential role of SPT in pediatric chronic pain outcomes.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-06-24T03:14:06.752Z</modification><creation>2026-06-24T03:07:22.802Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10939150</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38486938</pubmed><doi>10.1080/24740527.2023.2298769</doi></cross_references></HashMap>