<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Otto AK</submitter><funding>Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment</funding><funding>MD Anderson&amp;apos;s Cancer Center Support Grant</funding><funding>American Cancer Society</funding><funding>Rising Tide Foundation</funding><funding>Richard E. Haynes Distinguished Professorship for Clinical Cancer Prevention at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>e0297077</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939216</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Little evidence exists on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survivors, limiting recommendations to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population. We describe survivors' pandemic experiences and examine associations between COVID-19-related exposures, psychosocial experiences, and HRQoL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between May 2020-April 2021, survivors completed cross-sectional questionnaires capturing COVID-19-related exposures (e.g., exposure to virus, job loss); psychosocial experiences (i.e., COVID-19-related anxiety/depression, disruptions to health care and daily activities/social interactions, satisfaction with providers' response to COVID, financial hardship, perceived benefits of the pandemic, social support, and perceived stress management ability); and HRQoL.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Data were collected from N = 11,325 survivors in the United States. Participants were mostly female (58%), White (89%) and non-Hispanic (88%), and age 63 on average. Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (23%). Eight percent of participants reported being exposed to COVID-19; 1% tested positive. About 6% of participants lost their jobs, while 24% lost household income. Nearly 30% avoided attending in-person oncology appointments because of the pandemic. Poorer HRQoL was associated with demographic (younger age; female; non-Hispanic White), clinical (Medicare; stage IV disease; hematologic/digestive/respiratory system cancer), and psychosocial factors (low perceived benefits and stress management ability; more disruption to health care and daily activities/social interactions; financial hardship).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>COVID-19-related stressors were associated with various psychosocial experiences in cancer survivors, and these psychosocial experiences were associated with HRQoL above and beyond demographic and clinical factors.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of COVID-19-related experiences on health-related quality of life in cancer survivors in the United States.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10939216</pmcid><funding_grant_id>CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA240139</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 CA206110</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA240139</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>McQuade JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmed S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antoni MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wagner RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prinsloo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tworoger SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bower JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peoples AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez TI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penedo FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ulrich CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ochoa JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Natori A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otto AK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of COVID-19-related experiences on health-related quality of life in cancer survivors in the United States.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Little evidence exists on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survivors, limiting recommendations to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population. We describe survivors' pandemic experiences and examine associations between COVID-19-related exposures, psychosocial experiences, and HRQoL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between May 2020-April 2021, survivors completed cross-sectional questionnaires capturing COVID-19-related exposures (e.g., exposure to virus, job loss); psychosocial experiences (i.e., COVID-19-related anxiety/depression, disruptions to health care and daily activities/social interactions, satisfaction with providers' response to COVID, financial hardship, perceived benefits of the pandemic, social support, and perceived stress management ability); and HRQoL.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Data were collected from N = 11,325 survivors in the United States. Participants were mostly female (58%), White (89%) and non-Hispanic (88%), and age 63 on average. Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (23%). Eight percent of participants reported being exposed to COVID-19; 1% tested positive. About 6% of participants lost their jobs, while 24% lost household income. Nearly 30% avoided attending in-person oncology appointments because of the pandemic. Poorer HRQoL was associated with demographic (younger age; female; non-Hispanic White), clinical (Medicare; stage IV disease; hematologic/digestive/respiratory system cancer), and psychosocial factors (low perceived benefits and stress management ability; more disruption to health care and daily activities/social interactions; financial hardship).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>COVID-19-related stressors were associated with various psychosocial experiences in cancer survivors, and these psychosocial experiences were associated with HRQoL above and beyond demographic and clinical factors.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-06-27T03:23:00.197Z</modification><creation>2026-06-27T03:18:10.296Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10939216</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38484002</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0297077</doi></cross_references></HashMap>