{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["McLouth LE"],"funding":["National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences","NCATS NIH HHS","University of Kentucky","National Cancer Institute","Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky","NCI NIH HHS","National Institutes of Health"],"pagination":["337-345.e2"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939763"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["67(4)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Context</h4>Patient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment.<h4>Objectives</h4>We developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets).<h4>Methods</h4>We elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation.<h4>Results</h4>Partners agreed that the intervention-clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool-is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment."],"journal":["Journal of pain and symptom management"],"pubmed_title":["Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment."],"pmcid":["PMC10939763"],"funding_grant_id":["P30 CA177558","KL2TR001996","KL2 TR001996","L30 CA231709"],"pubmed_authors":["Zelaya CM","Shelton BJ","McFarlin JM","Chih MY","Hands I","Blu C","Stapleton JL","McLouth LE","Bursac V","Thakur K"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment.","description":"<h4>Context</h4>Patient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment.<h4>Objectives</h4>We developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets).<h4>Methods</h4>We elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation.<h4>Results</h4>Partners agreed that the intervention-clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool-is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment.","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Apr","modification":"2026-06-01T07:45:29.257Z","creation":"2026-04-08T10:36:31.298Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10939763","cross_references":{"pubmed":["38219963"],"doi":["10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.013"]}}