<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>McLouth LE</submitter><funding>National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>University of Kentucky</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>337-345.e2</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939763</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>67(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>Patient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>We developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Partners agreed that the intervention-clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool-is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of pain and symptom management</journal><pubmed_title>Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10939763</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA177558</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2TR001996</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR001996</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>L30 CA231709</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zelaya CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shelton BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McFarlin JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chih MY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hands I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stapleton JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLouth LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bursac V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thakur K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment.</name><description>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>Patient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>We developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Partners agreed that the intervention-clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool-is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-01T07:45:29.257Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T10:36:31.298Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10939763</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38219963</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.013</doi></cross_references></HashMap>