<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Butrovich MA</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>216679</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939791</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>586</volume><pubmed_abstract>Cancer and kidney disease disproportionately impact Black patients. The CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> equation was developed to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) without using race. We assessed the impact of using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> instead of CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> or Cockcroft-Gault (CG) on dosing and eligibility of anticancer drugs in Black and non-Black patients. Utilizing the National Cancer Institute Theradex database, deindexed eGFR (mL/min) was calculated for 3931 patients (8.6 % Black) using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>, CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub>, and CG. Dosing simulations based on each eGFR were performed for ten anticancer drugs with kidney function-based eligibility or dosing cutoffs. eGFR differences using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> varied between Black and non-Black patients (p &lt; 0.001); on average, Black patients had 10.3 mL/min lower eGFR and non-Black patients had 4.2 mL/min higher eGFR using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>. This corresponded to a difference in relative odds of cisplatin ineligibility using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub>; Black patients had 48 % higher odds of ineligibility and non-Black patients had 27 % lower odds of ineligibility using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> (p &lt; 0.001). When using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CG, eGFR differences were similar between Black and non-Black patients (p = 0.679) and relative difference in odds of cisplatin ineligibility did not vary. Using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> differentially impacts Black versus non-Black cancer patients; Black patients have lower calculated eGFR and are less likely to receive full doses of drug using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>. From the historical default of CG, adopting CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> would not disparately impact patients based on race, but would result in Black patients being less likely to receive full doses of drug than if CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> were used.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer letters</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of the 2021 CKD-EPI equation on anticancer pharmacotherapy in black and non-black cancer patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10939791</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA013330</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 CA186690</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA047904</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N02CM37106</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NO2-CM37106</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1CA186690</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 CA247643</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 TR004400</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30CA013330</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30CA47904</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24CA247643</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Nolin TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ivy SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Butrovich MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xue X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beumer JH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of the 2021 CKD-EPI equation on anticancer pharmacotherapy in black and non-black cancer patients.</name><description>Cancer and kidney disease disproportionately impact Black patients. The CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> equation was developed to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) without using race. We assessed the impact of using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> instead of CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> or Cockcroft-Gault (CG) on dosing and eligibility of anticancer drugs in Black and non-Black patients. Utilizing the National Cancer Institute Theradex database, deindexed eGFR (mL/min) was calculated for 3931 patients (8.6 % Black) using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>, CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub>, and CG. Dosing simulations based on each eGFR were performed for ten anticancer drugs with kidney function-based eligibility or dosing cutoffs. eGFR differences using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> varied between Black and non-Black patients (p &lt; 0.001); on average, Black patients had 10.3 mL/min lower eGFR and non-Black patients had 4.2 mL/min higher eGFR using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>. This corresponded to a difference in relative odds of cisplatin ineligibility using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub>; Black patients had 48 % higher odds of ineligibility and non-Black patients had 27 % lower odds of ineligibility using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> (p &lt; 0.001). When using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CG, eGFR differences were similar between Black and non-Black patients (p = 0.679) and relative difference in odds of cisplatin ineligibility did not vary. Using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> versus CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> differentially impacts Black versus non-Black cancer patients; Black patients have lower calculated eGFR and are less likely to receive full doses of drug using CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub>. From the historical default of CG, adopting CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2021&lt;/sub> would not disparately impact patients based on race, but would result in Black patients being less likely to receive full doses of drug than if CKD-EPI&lt;sub>2009&lt;/sub> were used.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2025-06-28T03:05:10.715Z</modification><creation>2025-06-28T03:05:10.715Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10939791</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38307411</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216679</doi></cross_references></HashMap>