<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Simon GE</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><pagination>13-19</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10939795</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>87</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Use health records data to predict suicide death following emergency department visits.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Electronic health records and insurance claims from seven health systems were used to: identify emergency department visits with mental health or self-harm diagnoses by members aged 11 or older; extract approximately 2500 potential predictors including demographic, historical, and baseline clinical characteristics; and ascertain subsequent deaths by self-harm. Logistic regression with lasso and random forest models predicted self-harm death over 90 days after each visit.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Records identified 2,069,170 eligible visits, 899 followed by suicide death within 90 days. The best-fitting logistic regression with lasso model yielded an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.823 (95% CI 0.810-0.836). Visits above the 95th percentile of predicted risk included 34.8% (95% CI 31.1-38.7) of subsequent suicide deaths and had a 0.303% (95% CI 0.261-0.346) suicide death rate over the following 90 days. Model performance was similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, and ethnicity.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Machine learning models using coded data from health records have moderate performance in predicting suicide death following emergency department visits for mental health or self-harm diagnosis and could be used to identify patients needing more systematic follow-up.</pubmed_abstract><journal>General hospital psychiatry</journal><pubmed_title>Predicting suicide death after emergency department visits with mental health or self-harm diagnoses.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10939795</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U19 MH121738</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Rossom RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beck A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daida YG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lynch FL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shortreed SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simon GE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmedani BK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coleman KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ziebell RA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Predicting suicide death after emergency department visits with mental health or self-harm diagnoses.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Use health records data to predict suicide death following emergency department visits.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Electronic health records and insurance claims from seven health systems were used to: identify emergency department visits with mental health or self-harm diagnoses by members aged 11 or older; extract approximately 2500 potential predictors including demographic, historical, and baseline clinical characteristics; and ascertain subsequent deaths by self-harm. Logistic regression with lasso and random forest models predicted self-harm death over 90 days after each visit.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Records identified 2,069,170 eligible visits, 899 followed by suicide death within 90 days. The best-fitting logistic regression with lasso model yielded an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.823 (95% CI 0.810-0.836). Visits above the 95th percentile of predicted risk included 34.8% (95% CI 31.1-38.7) of subsequent suicide deaths and had a 0.303% (95% CI 0.261-0.346) suicide death rate over the following 90 days. Model performance was similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, and ethnicity.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Machine learning models using coded data from health records have moderate performance in predicting suicide death following emergency department visits for mental health or self-harm diagnosis and could be used to identify patients needing more systematic follow-up.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar-Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-22T18:50:30.688Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T02:38:34.142Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10939795</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38277798</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.01.009</doi></cross_references></HashMap>