<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shah S</submitter><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute on Drug Abuse</funding><pagination>2457-2461</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10940736</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>78(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The incidence of Serratia endocarditis is increasing, yet optimal treatment has not been defined. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients with Serratia endocarditis by treatment strategy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We reviewed adult patients with definitive Serratia endocarditis at two independent health systems between July 2001 and April 2023. Combination therapy was defined as receipt of ≥2 in vitro active agents for ≥72 h.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Seventy-five patients were included; 64% (48/75) were male and 85% (64/75) were people who inject drugs. Compared with monotherapy, receipt of combination therapy was associated with lower rates of microbiological failure (0% versus 15%, P = 0.026) and 90 day all-cause mortality (11% versus 31%, P = 0.049). Antimicrobial discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common among patients receiving combination therapy compared with monotherapy (36% versus 8%, P = 0.058).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In the largest series of Serratia endocarditis to date, combination antibiotic treatment was associated with improved outcomes. However, larger, prospective studies are warranted.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</journal><pubmed_title>Serratia endocarditis: antimicrobial management strategies and clinical outcomes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10940736</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K23DA049946</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 DA049946</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>McCrary M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shields RK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schranz AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shah S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Topal J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slain D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marx A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clarke L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stoner BJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Serratia endocarditis: antimicrobial management strategies and clinical outcomes.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The incidence of Serratia endocarditis is increasing, yet optimal treatment has not been defined. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients with Serratia endocarditis by treatment strategy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We reviewed adult patients with definitive Serratia endocarditis at two independent health systems between July 2001 and April 2023. Combination therapy was defined as receipt of ≥2 in vitro active agents for ≥72 h.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Seventy-five patients were included; 64% (48/75) were male and 85% (64/75) were people who inject drugs. Compared with monotherapy, receipt of combination therapy was associated with lower rates of microbiological failure (0% versus 15%, P = 0.026) and 90 day all-cause mortality (11% versus 31%, P = 0.049). Antimicrobial discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common among patients receiving combination therapy compared with monotherapy (36% versus 8%, P = 0.058).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In the largest series of Serratia endocarditis to date, combination antibiotic treatment was associated with improved outcomes. However, larger, prospective studies are warranted.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Oct</publication><modification>2026-03-17T16:15:18.625Z</modification><creation>2025-08-21T09:50:33.818Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10940736</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37563876</pubmed><doi>10.1093/jac/dkad254</doi></cross_references></HashMap>