<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hou L</submitter><funding>State Key Program of National Natural Science of China</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China General Project</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Key R&amp;amp;D Program of Shandong Province</funding><funding>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding><funding>Beijing Natural Science Foundation</funding><pagination>bbae086</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10940843</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Causal discovery is a powerful tool to disclose underlying structures by analyzing purely observational data. Genetic variants can provide useful complementary information for structure learning. Recently, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have provided abundant marginal causal relationships of traits. Here, we propose a causal network pruning algorithm MRSL (MR-based structure learning algorithm) based on these marginal causal relationships. MRSL combines the graph theory with multivariable MR to learn the conditional causal structure using only genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) summary statistics. Specifically, MRSL utilizes topological sorting to improve the precision of structure learning. It proposes MR-separation instead of d-separation and three candidates of sufficient separating set for MR-separation. The results of simulations revealed that MRSL had up to 2-fold higher F1 score and 100 times faster computing time than other eight competitive methods. Furthermore, we applied MRSL to 26 biomarkers and 44 International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD10)-defined diseases using GWAS summary data from UK Biobank. The results cover most of the expected causal links that have biological interpretations and several new links supported by clinical case reports or previous observational literatures.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Briefings in bioinformatics</journal><pubmed_title>MRSL: a causal network pruning algorithm based on GWAS summary data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10940843</pmcid><funding_grant_id>82220108002</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>7244458</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2022YFC3502100</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>82173625</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>82330108</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2021SFGC0504</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hou L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xue F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geng Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuan Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi X</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>MRSL: a causal network pruning algorithm based on GWAS summary data.</name><description>Causal discovery is a powerful tool to disclose underlying structures by analyzing purely observational data. Genetic variants can provide useful complementary information for structure learning. Recently, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have provided abundant marginal causal relationships of traits. Here, we propose a causal network pruning algorithm MRSL (MR-based structure learning algorithm) based on these marginal causal relationships. MRSL combines the graph theory with multivariable MR to learn the conditional causal structure using only genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) summary statistics. Specifically, MRSL utilizes topological sorting to improve the precision of structure learning. It proposes MR-separation instead of d-separation and three candidates of sufficient separating set for MR-separation. The results of simulations revealed that MRSL had up to 2-fold higher F1 score and 100 times faster computing time than other eight competitive methods. Furthermore, we applied MRSL to 26 biomarkers and 44 International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD10)-defined diseases using GWAS summary data from UK Biobank. The results cover most of the expected causal links that have biological interpretations and several new links supported by clinical case reports or previous observational literatures.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jan</publication><modification>2025-07-06T03:04:32.365Z</modification><creation>2025-07-06T03:04:32.365Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10940843</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38487847</pubmed><doi>10.1093/bib/bbae086</doi></cross_references></HashMap>