<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Amundsen SK</submitter><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>168482</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10947171</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>436(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Repair of broken DNA is essential for life; the reactions involved can also promote genetic recombination to aid evolution. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD enzyme is required for the major pathway of these events. RecBCD is a complex ATP-dependent DNA helicase with nuclease activity controlled by Chi recombination hotspots (5'-GCTGGTGG-3'). During rapid DNA unwinding, when Chi is in a RecC tunnel, RecB nuclease nicks DNA at Chi. Here, we test our signal transduction model - upon binding Chi (step 1), RecC signals RecD helicase to stop unwinding (step 2); RecD then signals RecB (step 3) to nick at Chi (step 4) and to begin loading RecA DNA strand-exchange protein (step 5). We discovered that ATP-γ-S, like the small molecule RecBCD inhibitor NSAC1003, causes RecBCD to nick DNA, independent of Chi, at novel positions determined by the DNA substrate length. Two RecB ATPase-site mutants nick at novel positions determined by their RecB:RecD helicase rate ratios. In each case, we find that nicking at the novel position requires steps 3 and 4 but not step 1 or 2, as shown by mutants altered at the intersubunit contacts specific for each step; nicking also requires RecD helicase and RecB nuclease activities. Thus, altering the RecB ATPase site, by small molecules or mutation, sensitizes RecD to signal RecB to nick DNA (steps 4 and 3, respecitvely) without the signal from RecC or Chi (steps 1 and 2). These new, enzymatic results strongly support the signal transduction model and provide a paradigm for studying other complex enzymes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of molecular biology</journal><pubmed_title>Chi hotspot Control of RecBCD Helicase-nuclease: Enzymatic Tests Support the Intramolecular Signal-transduction Model.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10947171</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R35 GM118120</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Smith GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amundsen SK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Chi hotspot Control of RecBCD Helicase-nuclease: Enzymatic Tests Support the Intramolecular Signal-transduction Model.</name><description>Repair of broken DNA is essential for life; the reactions involved can also promote genetic recombination to aid evolution. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD enzyme is required for the major pathway of these events. RecBCD is a complex ATP-dependent DNA helicase with nuclease activity controlled by Chi recombination hotspots (5'-GCTGGTGG-3'). During rapid DNA unwinding, when Chi is in a RecC tunnel, RecB nuclease nicks DNA at Chi. Here, we test our signal transduction model - upon binding Chi (step 1), RecC signals RecD helicase to stop unwinding (step 2); RecD then signals RecB (step 3) to nick at Chi (step 4) and to begin loading RecA DNA strand-exchange protein (step 5). We discovered that ATP-γ-S, like the small molecule RecBCD inhibitor NSAC1003, causes RecBCD to nick DNA, independent of Chi, at novel positions determined by the DNA substrate length. Two RecB ATPase-site mutants nick at novel positions determined by their RecB:RecD helicase rate ratios. In each case, we find that nicking at the novel position requires steps 3 and 4 but not step 1 or 2, as shown by mutants altered at the intersubunit contacts specific for each step; nicking also requires RecD helicase and RecB nuclease activities. Thus, altering the RecB ATPase site, by small molecules or mutation, sensitizes RecD to signal RecB to nick DNA (steps 4 and 3, respecitvely) without the signal from RecC or Chi (steps 1 and 2). These new, enzymatic results strongly support the signal transduction model and provide a paradigm for studying other complex enzymes.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-01T22:25:21.795Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T01:28:24.135Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10947171</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38331210</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168482</doi></cross_references></HashMap>