<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bangash H</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>U.S. Department of Health &amp;amp; Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>U.S. Department of Health &amp;amp; Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute</funding><pagination>73</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10948900</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Severe hypercholesterolemia/possible familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is relatively common but underdiagnosed and undertreated. We investigated whether implementing clinical decision support (CDS) was associated with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia/possible FH (LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL). As part of a pre-post implementation study, a CDS alert was deployed in the electronic health record (EHR) in a large health system comprising 3 main sites, 16 hospitals and 53 clinics. Data were collected for 3 months before ('silent mode') and after ('active mode') its implementation. Clinicians were only able to view the alert in the EHR during active mode. We matched individuals 1:1 in both modes, based on age, sex, and baseline lipid lowering therapy (LLT). The primary outcome was difference in LDL-C between the two groups and the secondary outcome was initiation/intensification of LLT after alert trigger. We identified 800 matched patients in each mode (mean ± SD age 56.1 ± 11.8 y vs. 55.9 ± 11.8 y; 36.0% male in both groups; mean ± SD initial LDL-C 211.3 ± 27.4 mg/dL vs. 209.8 ± 23.9 mg/dL; 11.2% on LLT at baseline in each group). LDL-C levels were 6.6 mg/dL lower (95% CI, -10.7 to -2.5; P = 0.002) in active vs. silent mode. The odds of high-intensity statin use (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.41-2.23; P &lt; 0.001) and LLT initiation/intensification (OR, 1.30, 95% CI, 1.06-1.58, P = 0.01) were higher in active vs. silent mode. Implementation of a CDS was associated with lowering of LDL-C levels in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia/possible FH, likely due to higher rates of clinician led LLT initiation/intensification.</pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ digital medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of clinical decision support for severe hypercholesterolemia on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10948900</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL135879</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 HL137010</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HG006379</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HL135879</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UO1 HG06379</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bailey KR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alhalabi L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sutton J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sherafati A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnsen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamed ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naderian M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bangash H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibbons D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gundelach JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saadatagah S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elsekaily O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mir A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kullo IJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wood-Wentz CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caraballo PJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of clinical decision support for severe hypercholesterolemia on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.</name><description>Severe hypercholesterolemia/possible familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is relatively common but underdiagnosed and undertreated. We investigated whether implementing clinical decision support (CDS) was associated with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia/possible FH (LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL). As part of a pre-post implementation study, a CDS alert was deployed in the electronic health record (EHR) in a large health system comprising 3 main sites, 16 hospitals and 53 clinics. Data were collected for 3 months before ('silent mode') and after ('active mode') its implementation. Clinicians were only able to view the alert in the EHR during active mode. We matched individuals 1:1 in both modes, based on age, sex, and baseline lipid lowering therapy (LLT). The primary outcome was difference in LDL-C between the two groups and the secondary outcome was initiation/intensification of LLT after alert trigger. We identified 800 matched patients in each mode (mean ± SD age 56.1 ± 11.8 y vs. 55.9 ± 11.8 y; 36.0% male in both groups; mean ± SD initial LDL-C 211.3 ± 27.4 mg/dL vs. 209.8 ± 23.9 mg/dL; 11.2% on LLT at baseline in each group). LDL-C levels were 6.6 mg/dL lower (95% CI, -10.7 to -2.5; P = 0.002) in active vs. silent mode. The odds of high-intensity statin use (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.41-2.23; P &lt; 0.001) and LLT initiation/intensification (OR, 1.30, 95% CI, 1.06-1.58, P = 0.01) were higher in active vs. silent mode. Implementation of a CDS was associated with lowering of LDL-C levels in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia/possible FH, likely due to higher rates of clinician led LLT initiation/intensification.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-24T03:10:26.18Z</modification><creation>2026-06-24T03:04:36.185Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10948900</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38499608</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41746-024-01069-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>