<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>35(2)</volume><submitter>Tozzi R</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>A non-randomized prospective clinical trial (ULTRA-LAP) was registered to test safety, side effects and efficacy of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC). A pilot study was designed to identify which OC patients are suitable to undergo L-VPD.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2016 and October 2021, all consecutive patients with OC underwent exploratory laparoscopy (EXL). All patients whose disease was deemed amenable for a complete resection (CR) at imaging review and EXL, underwent VPD. In all patients a consistent attempt was made at completing L-VPD.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Two hundred and eight OC had EXL in the study period: 121 underwent interval VPD and 87 up-front VPD. Overall, 158 patients had VPD by laparotomy (75.9%) and 50 (24.1%) had L-VPD, of which 34 patients as interval (iL-VPD) and 16 as up-front (uL-VPD). Intra- and post-operative morbidity was very low in the L-VPD group. CR rate was 98% in L-VPD group and 94% in VPD. Most common reason for conversion was diaphragmatic disease extending dorsally.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In the pilot study of ULTRA-LAP, L-VPD was completed in 24,1% of OC. Initial analysis supports the feasibility of L-VPD in 2 groups of OC: those with no gross disease at interval surgery and those with gross visible disease at upfront or interval surgery, but limited to: pelvis (including recto-sigmoid), gastro colic omentum, peritoneum and diaphragm, the latter not requiring dorsal liver mobilization. Both groups had 100% feasibility and have been thus forth recruited to ULTRA-LAP.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05862740.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of gynecologic oncology</journal><pagination>e14</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10948990</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Feasibility of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer: the ULTRA-LAP trial pilot study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10948990</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Noventa M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saccardi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marchetti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tozzi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coldebella D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spagnol G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Tommasi O</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Feasibility of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer: the ULTRA-LAP trial pilot study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>A non-randomized prospective clinical trial (ULTRA-LAP) was registered to test safety, side effects and efficacy of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC). A pilot study was designed to identify which OC patients are suitable to undergo L-VPD.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2016 and October 2021, all consecutive patients with OC underwent exploratory laparoscopy (EXL). All patients whose disease was deemed amenable for a complete resection (CR) at imaging review and EXL, underwent VPD. In all patients a consistent attempt was made at completing L-VPD.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Two hundred and eight OC had EXL in the study period: 121 underwent interval VPD and 87 up-front VPD. Overall, 158 patients had VPD by laparotomy (75.9%) and 50 (24.1%) had L-VPD, of which 34 patients as interval (iL-VPD) and 16 as up-front (uL-VPD). Intra- and post-operative morbidity was very low in the L-VPD group. CR rate was 98% in L-VPD group and 94% in VPD. Most common reason for conversion was diaphragmatic disease extending dorsally.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In the pilot study of ULTRA-LAP, L-VPD was completed in 24,1% of OC. Initial analysis supports the feasibility of L-VPD in 2 groups of OC: those with no gross disease at interval surgery and those with gross visible disease at upfront or interval surgery, but limited to: pelvis (including recto-sigmoid), gastro colic omentum, peritoneum and diaphragm, the latter not requiring dorsal liver mobilization. Both groups had 100% feasibility and have been thus forth recruited to ULTRA-LAP.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05862740.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2024-12-04T10:51:04.241Z</modification><creation>2024-12-04T10:51:04.241Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10948990</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37921599</pubmed><doi>10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e14</doi></cross_references></HashMap>