<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>81(5)</volume><submitter>Jouvenot G</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>A recent randomized clinical trial concluded that discontinuing medium-efficacy therapy might be a reasonable option for older patients with nonactive multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is a lack of data on discontinuing high-efficacy therapy (HET). In younger patients, the discontinuation of natalizumab and fingolimod is associated with a risk of rebound of disease activity.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether discontinuing HET in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS is associated with an increased risk of relapse compared with continuing HET.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This observational cohort study used data from 38 referral centers from the French MS registry (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques [OFSEP] database). Among 84704 pat</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA neurology</journal><pagination>490-498</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10964164</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>High-Efficacy Therapy Discontinuation vs Continuation in Patients 50 Years and Older With Nonactive MS.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10964164</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Collongues N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Page E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Labauge P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerbrat A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heinzlef O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giannesini C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Debouverie M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pachot A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rollot F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreau T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kremer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Casez O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bakchine S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vukusic S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hankiewicz K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cotton F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maurousset A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zephir H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciron J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thouvenot E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lefort M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papeix C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cabre P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moulin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maillart E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wiertlewsky S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berger E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillememin F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jouvenot G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>OFSEP Investigators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Douek P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Audoin B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pelletier J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Camdessanche JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clavelou P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michel L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maubeuge N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Defer G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neau JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doghri I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pottier C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edan G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magy L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stankoff B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montcuquet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Seze J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Labeyrie C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bigaut K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lubetzki C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rigaud-Bully C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Casey R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mathey G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bourre B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nifle C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lebrun-Frenay C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wahab A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fromont A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gout O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ben-Nasr H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al-Khedr A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marignier R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Courbon G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laplaud DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olaiz J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>High-Efficacy Therapy Discontinuation vs Continuation in Patients 50 Years and Older With Nonactive MS.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>A recent randomized clinical trial concluded that discontinuing medium-efficacy therapy might be a reasonable option for older patients with nonactive multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is a lack of data on discontinuing high-efficacy therapy (HET). In younger patients, the discontinuation of natalizumab and fingolimod is associated with a risk of rebound of disease activity.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether discontinuing HET in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS is associated with an increased risk of relapse compared with continuing HET.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This observational cohort study used data from 38 referral centers from the French MS registry (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques [OFSEP] database). Among 84704 pat</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2025-06-25T03:04:32.279Z</modification><creation>2025-06-25T03:04:32.279Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10964164</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38526462</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0395</doi></cross_references></HashMap>