{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Boehmer KR"],"funding":["NCATS NIH HHS","NIDDK NIH HHS"],"pagination":["107975"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10964774"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["117"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Health and Wellness Coaching (HWC) may be beneficial in chronic condition care. We sought to appraise its effectiveness on quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy (SE), depression, and anxiety.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized trials published January 2005 - March 2023 that compared HWC to standard clinical care or another intervention without coaching. We examined QoL, SE, depression, or anxiety outcomes. Meta-analysis utilizing the random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD).<h4>Results</h4>Thirty included studies demonstrated that HWC improved QoL within 3 months (SMD 0.62 95 % CI 0.22-1.02, p = 0.002), SE within 1.5 months (SMD 0.38, 95 % CI 0.03-0.73, p = 0.03),"],"journal":["Patient education and counseling"],"pubmed_title":["The impact of health and wellness coaching on patient-important outcomes in chronic illness care: A systematic review and meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC10964774"],"funding_grant_id":["L30 TR002972","K01 DK133643"],"pubmed_authors":["Boehmer KR","Ruiz-Hernandez FG","Alvarez-Villalobos NA","Abdelrahim M","Vaquera-Alfaro H","Murad MH","Gionfriddo MR","de Leon-Gutierrez H","Spencer-Bonilla G","Barakat S","Elizondo-Omana GG","Millan-Alanis JM","Prokop LJ","Wang Z","Ahn S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"The impact of health and wellness coaching on patient-important outcomes in chronic illness care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Health and Wellness Coaching (HWC) may be beneficial in chronic condition care. We sought to appraise its effectiveness on quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy (SE), depression, and anxiety.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized trials published January 2005 - March 2023 that compared HWC to standard clinical care or another intervention without coaching. We examined QoL, SE, depression, or anxiety outcomes. Meta-analysis utilizing the random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD).<h4>Results</h4>Thirty included studies demonstrated that HWC improved QoL within 3 months (SMD 0.62 95 % CI 0.22-1.02, p = 0.002), SE within 1.5 months (SMD 0.38, 95 % CI 0.03-0.73, p = 0.03),","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Dec","modification":"2025-04-18T12:55:43.18Z","creation":"2025-04-06T22:18:02.303Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10964774","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37738790"],"doi":["10.1016/j.pec.2023.107975"]}}