<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bartsch SM</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>102369</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10965405</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>68</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>With efforts underway to develop a universal coronavirus vaccine, otherwise known as a pan-coronavirus vaccine, this is the time to offer potential funders, researchers, and manufacturers guidance on the potential value of such a vaccine and how this value may change with differing vaccine and vaccination characteristics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using a computational model representing the United States (U.S.) population, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the various clinical and economic outcomes of COVID-19 such as hospitalisations, deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, productivity losses, direct medical costs, and total societal costs, we explored the impact of a universal vaccine under different circumstances. We developed and populated this model using data reported by the CDC as well as observational studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Findings&lt;/h4>A pan-coronavirus vaccine would be cost saving in the U.S. as a standalone intervention as long as its vaccine efficacy is ≥10% and vaccination coverage is ≥10%. Every 1% increase in efficacy between 10% and 50% could avert an additional 395,000 infections and save $1.0 billion in total societal costs ($45.3 million in productivity losses, $1.1 billion in direct medical costs). It would remain cost saving even when a strain-specific coronavirus vaccine would be subsequently available, as long as it takes at least 2-3 months to develop, test, and bring that more specific vaccine to the market.&lt;h4>Interpretation&lt;/h4>Our results provide support for the development and stockpiling of a pan-coronavirus vaccine and help delineate the vaccine characteristics to aim for in development of such a vaccine.&lt;h4>Funding&lt;/h4>The National Science Foundation, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the City University of New York.</pubmed_abstract><journal>EClinicalMedicine</journal><pubmed_title>The potential epidemiologic, clinical, and economic value of a universal coronavirus vaccine: a modelling study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10965405</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HS028165</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM127512</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 AI172725</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 TR004279</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Velmurugan K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chin KL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heneghan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee BY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bottazzi ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Shea KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartsch SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strych U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>John DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciciriello A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hotez PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scannell SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weatherwax C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The potential epidemiologic, clinical, and economic value of a universal coronavirus vaccine: a modelling study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>With efforts underway to develop a universal coronavirus vaccine, otherwise known as a pan-coronavirus vaccine, this is the time to offer potential funders, researchers, and manufacturers guidance on the potential value of such a vaccine and how this value may change with differing vaccine and vaccination characteristics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using a computational model representing the United States (U.S.) population, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the various clinical and economic outcomes of COVID-19 such as hospitalisations, deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, productivity losses, direct medical costs, and total societal costs, we explored the impact of a universal vaccine under different circumstances. We developed and populated this model using data reported by the CDC as well as observational studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Findings&lt;/h4>A pan-coronavirus vaccine would be cost saving in the U.S. as a standalone intervention as long as its vaccine efficacy is ≥10% and vaccination coverage is ≥10%. Every 1% increase in efficacy between 10% and 50% could avert an additional 395,000 infections and save $1.0 billion in total societal costs ($45.3 million in productivity losses, $1.1 billion in direct medical costs). It would remain cost saving even when a strain-specific coronavirus vaccine would be subsequently available, as long as it takes at least 2-3 months to develop, test, and bring that more specific vaccine to the market.&lt;h4>Interpretation&lt;/h4>Our results provide support for the development and stockpiling of a pan-coronavirus vaccine and help delineate the vaccine characteristics to aim for in development of such a vaccine.&lt;h4>Funding&lt;/h4>The National Science Foundation, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the City University of New York.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:52:55.947Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:52:55.947Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10965405</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38545093</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102369</doi></cross_references></HashMap>