<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(4)</volume><submitter>Grimaldi G</submitter><funding>European Cooperation in Science and Technology</funding><funding>MIUR</funding><funding>Eni SpA</funding><pubmed_abstract>Discovery of iron-based superconductors paved the way to a competitor of high-temperature superconductors, easier to produce, better performing in high fields, and promising to be less expensive. Critical parameters are investigated by resistivity measurements as a function of temperature, field, and angle &lt;i>R&lt;/i>(&lt;i>T,H,θ&lt;/i>). This work presents a deep analysis of &lt;i>H&lt;/i>-&lt;i>θ&lt;/i> phase diagram of PLD-processed Fe(Se,Te) superconducting films, thus revealing material and pinning anisotropy at once. By selecting different thresholds along the &lt;i>R&lt;/i>(&lt;i>T,H,θ&lt;/i>) curves, all possible regimes emerge. Surprisingly, anisotropy arises moving from the upper critical field toward the irreversibility line: gradually a non-monotonous transition from 3D to 2D, and backward to 3D occurs. Although Fe(Se,Te) appears as a 3D superconductor, its anisotropic pinning landscape shows up similarities with an intrinsic layered superconductor and Fe(Se,Te) definitively mimics YBCO. We propose a general method to disentangle, in any other superconductor, material dimensionality and pinning anisotropy that are key constraints for applications.</pubmed_abstract><journal>iScience</journal><pagination>109422</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10966314</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Unveiling intrinsic material and extrinsic pinning dimensionality in superconductors: Why Fe(Se,Te) is able to mimic YBCO.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10966314</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Rizzo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grimaldi G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braccini V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nigro A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Augieri A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iebole M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polichetti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scuderi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Celentano G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galluzzi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan MR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Unveiling intrinsic material and extrinsic pinning dimensionality in superconductors: Why Fe(Se,Te) is able to mimic YBCO.</name><description>Discovery of iron-based superconductors paved the way to a competitor of high-temperature superconductors, easier to produce, better performing in high fields, and promising to be less expensive. Critical parameters are investigated by resistivity measurements as a function of temperature, field, and angle &lt;i>R&lt;/i>(&lt;i>T,H,θ&lt;/i>). This work presents a deep analysis of &lt;i>H&lt;/i>-&lt;i>θ&lt;/i> phase diagram of PLD-processed Fe(Se,Te) superconducting films, thus revealing material and pinning anisotropy at once. By selecting different thresholds along the &lt;i>R&lt;/i>(&lt;i>T,H,θ&lt;/i>) curves, all possible regimes emerge. Surprisingly, anisotropy arises moving from the upper critical field toward the irreversibility line: gradually a non-monotonous transition from 3D to 2D, and backward to 3D occurs. Although Fe(Se,Te) appears as a 3D superconductor, its anisotropic pinning landscape shows up similarities with an intrinsic layered superconductor and Fe(Se,Te) definitively mimics YBCO. We propose a general method to disentangle, in any other superconductor, material dimensionality and pinning anisotropy that are key constraints for applications.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:52:52.799Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:52:52.799Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10966314</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38544568</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2024.109422</doi></cross_references></HashMap>