<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><submitter>Carling RS</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Since the UK commenced newborn screening for isovaleric acidemia in 2015, changes in prescribing have increased the incidence of false positive (FP) results due to pivaloylcarnitine. A review of screening results between 2015 and 2022 identified 24 true positive (TP) and 84 FP cases, with pivalate interference confirmed in 76/84. Initial C5 carnitine (C5C) did not discriminate between FP and TP with median (range) C5C of 2.9 (2.0-9.6) and 4.0 (1.8->70) µmol/L, respectively, and neither did Precision Newborn Screening via Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), which identified only 1/47 FP cases. However, among the TP cases, disease severity showed a correlation with initial C5C in 'asymptomatic' individuals (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 17), demonstrating a median (range) C5C of 3.0 (1.8-7.1) whilst 'clinically affected' patients (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 7), showed a median (range) C5C of 13.9 (7.7-70) µmol/L. These findings allowed the introduction of dual cut-off values into the screening algorithm to reduce the incidence of FPs, with initial C5C results ≥ 5 µmol/L triggering urgent referral, and those >2.0 and &lt;5.0 µmol/L prompting second-tier C5-isobar testing. This will avoid delayed referral in babies at particular risk whilst reducing the FP rate for the remainder.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of neonatal screening</journal><pagination>24</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10970767</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10970767</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Carling RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghosh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonham JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pierre G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ssali J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taj N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hall PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemonde H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenfield T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chakrapani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anderson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sreekantam S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu THY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moat SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hedgethorne K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shakespeare L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flynn N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharrard M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK.</name><description>Since the UK commenced newborn screening for isovaleric acidemia in 2015, changes in prescribing have increased the incidence of false positive (FP) results due to pivaloylcarnitine. A review of screening results between 2015 and 2022 identified 24 true positive (TP) and 84 FP cases, with pivalate interference confirmed in 76/84. Initial C5 carnitine (C5C) did not discriminate between FP and TP with median (range) C5C of 2.9 (2.0-9.6) and 4.0 (1.8->70) µmol/L, respectively, and neither did Precision Newborn Screening via Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), which identified only 1/47 FP cases. However, among the TP cases, disease severity showed a correlation with initial C5C in 'asymptomatic' individuals (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 17), demonstrating a median (range) C5C of 3.0 (1.8-7.1) whilst 'clinically affected' patients (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 7), showed a median (range) C5C of 13.9 (7.7-70) µmol/L. These findings allowed the introduction of dual cut-off values into the screening algorithm to reduce the incidence of FPs, with initial C5C results ≥ 5 µmol/L triggering urgent referral, and those >2.0 and &lt;5.0 µmol/L prompting second-tier C5-isobar testing. This will avoid delayed referral in babies at particular risk whilst reducing the FP rate for the remainder.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:53:00.089Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:53:00.089Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10970767</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38535128</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ijns10010024</doi></cross_references></HashMap>