<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(4)</volume><submitter>Gulikers JL</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>-mutated (&lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m+) NSCLC. Despite good BM-related outcomes of osimertinib, several patients still experience intracranial progression. A possible explanation is pharmacologic failure due to low plasma trough levels (C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub>) and consequently limited intracranial osimertinib exposure. We investigated the relation between osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> and BM development or progression.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A prospective multicenter cohort study, including patients receiving osimertinib for advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m&lt;i>+&lt;/i> NSCLC. At osimertinib start, patients were allocated to the BM or no or unknown BM cohort and were further divided into subgroups based on osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> (low, middle, and high exposure). Cumulative incidence of BM progression or development and overall survival were determined for each group.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 173 patients were included, with 49 (28.3%) had baseline BM. Of these patients, 36.7% experienced BM progression, of which 16.7% in the low (&lt;159.3 ng/mL), 40.0% in the middle, and 47.1% in the high (>270.7 ng/mL) C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroups. After 12 months, the cumulative incidence of BM progression for the BM cohort was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-49.0), 31% (95% CI:10.6-53.9), and 31% (95% CI:10.8-54.5) per C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroup, respectively. After 20 months, this was 20% (95% CI:2.6-49.0), 52% (95% CI:23.8-74.2), and 57% (95% CI:24.9-79.7), respectively. For the no or unknown BM cohort, 4.0% developed BM without differences within C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroups.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>No relation was found between osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> and BM development or progression in patients with advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m&lt;i>+&lt;/i> NSCLC. This suggests that systemic osimertinib exposure is not a surrogate marker for BM development or progression.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JTO clinical and research reports</journal><pagination>100656</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10973185</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Osimertinib Plasma Trough Concentration in Relation to Brain Metastases Development in Patients With Advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>-Mutated NSCLC.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10973185</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kruithof PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dursun S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mathijssen RHJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tjan-Heijnen VCG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jebbink M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hendriks LEL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veerman GDM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Driessen JHM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Croes S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dingemans AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steendam CMJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gulikers JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boosman RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smit EF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Geel RMJM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Osimertinib Plasma Trough Concentration in Relation to Brain Metastases Development in Patients With Advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>-Mutated NSCLC.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>-mutated (&lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m+) NSCLC. Despite good BM-related outcomes of osimertinib, several patients still experience intracranial progression. A possible explanation is pharmacologic failure due to low plasma trough levels (C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub>) and consequently limited intracranial osimertinib exposure. We investigated the relation between osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> and BM development or progression.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A prospective multicenter cohort study, including patients receiving osimertinib for advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m&lt;i>+&lt;/i> NSCLC. At osimertinib start, patients were allocated to the BM or no or unknown BM cohort and were further divided into subgroups based on osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> (low, middle, and high exposure). Cumulative incidence of BM progression or development and overall survival were determined for each group.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 173 patients were included, with 49 (28.3%) had baseline BM. Of these patients, 36.7% experienced BM progression, of which 16.7% in the low (&lt;159.3 ng/mL), 40.0% in the middle, and 47.1% in the high (>270.7 ng/mL) C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroups. After 12 months, the cumulative incidence of BM progression for the BM cohort was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-49.0), 31% (95% CI:10.6-53.9), and 31% (95% CI:10.8-54.5) per C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroup, respectively. After 20 months, this was 20% (95% CI:2.6-49.0), 52% (95% CI:23.8-74.2), and 57% (95% CI:24.9-79.7), respectively. For the no or unknown BM cohort, 4.0% developed BM without differences within C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> subgroups.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>No relation was found between osimertinib C&lt;sub>min,SS&lt;/sub> and BM development or progression in patients with advanced &lt;i>EGFR&lt;/i>m&lt;i>+&lt;/i> NSCLC. This suggests that systemic osimertinib exposure is not a surrogate marker for BM development or progression.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-26T11:21:26.895Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T13:41:05.683Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10973185</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38550297</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100656</doi></cross_references></HashMap>