<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Glackin CC</submitter><funding>BiodivERsA</funding><funding>Federal Ministry of Education and Research</funding><pagination>614</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10974389</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>With rising infection rates in recent years, &lt;i>Vibrio vulnificus&lt;/i> poses an increasing threat to public safety in the coastal brackish Baltic Sea. It is therefore important to monitor this organism and assess the &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> infection risk on a more regular basis. However, as the coastline of the Baltic Sea is 8000 km long and shared by nine nations, a convenient, fast, inexpensive, yet efficient &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> identification method is essential. We evaluated the effectiveness of a two-step agar-based approach consisting of successive &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> isolation and cultivation on thiosulphate-citrate-bile salt sucrose (TCBS) agar and CHROMagar™ &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> for &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> in comparison with &lt;i>V. cholerae&lt;/i>, &lt;i>V. parahaemolyticus&lt;/i>, and &lt;i>V. alginolyticus&lt;/i>. Our study contains isolates from water and sediment across a broad expanse of the Baltic Sea including 13 locations and two different summers, the time of year during which &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> infections are usually much more frequent. Confirmation of isolate species identity was carried out using molecular analyses. The two-step agar plating method performed well across different locations and timeframes in correctly identifying &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> by more than 80%, but the sensitivity in other &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> species varied. Thus, our approach yielded promising results as a potential tool for early &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> detection across a broad timeframe and transect of the Baltic Sea and potentially other brackish environments.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Microorganisms</journal><pubmed_title>Combined TCBS and CHROMagar Analyses Allow for Basic Identification of &lt;i>Vibrio vulnificus&lt;/i> within a 48 h Incubation Period in the Coastal Baltic Sea.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10974389</pmcid><funding_grant_id>03ZU1107KA</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>16LC2022A</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chandra TS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dupke S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Labrenz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riedinger D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glackin CC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Combined TCBS and CHROMagar Analyses Allow for Basic Identification of &lt;i>Vibrio vulnificus&lt;/i> within a 48 h Incubation Period in the Coastal Baltic Sea.</name><description>With rising infection rates in recent years, &lt;i>Vibrio vulnificus&lt;/i> poses an increasing threat to public safety in the coastal brackish Baltic Sea. It is therefore important to monitor this organism and assess the &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> infection risk on a more regular basis. However, as the coastline of the Baltic Sea is 8000 km long and shared by nine nations, a convenient, fast, inexpensive, yet efficient &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> identification method is essential. We evaluated the effectiveness of a two-step agar-based approach consisting of successive &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> isolation and cultivation on thiosulphate-citrate-bile salt sucrose (TCBS) agar and CHROMagar™ &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> for &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> in comparison with &lt;i>V. cholerae&lt;/i>, &lt;i>V. parahaemolyticus&lt;/i>, and &lt;i>V. alginolyticus&lt;/i>. Our study contains isolates from water and sediment across a broad expanse of the Baltic Sea including 13 locations and two different summers, the time of year during which &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> infections are usually much more frequent. Confirmation of isolate species identity was carried out using molecular analyses. The two-step agar plating method performed well across different locations and timeframes in correctly identifying &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> by more than 80%, but the sensitivity in other &lt;i>Vibrio&lt;/i> species varied. Thus, our approach yielded promising results as a potential tool for early &lt;i>V. vulnificus&lt;/i> detection across a broad timeframe and transect of the Baltic Sea and potentially other brackish environments.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-04-08T18:53:54.815Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T19:11:32.75Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10974389</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38543665</pubmed><doi>10.3390/microorganisms12030614</doi></cross_references></HashMap>