<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Joe S</submitter><funding>KRIBB Research Initiative Program</funding><funding>Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea</funding><pagination>318</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10976732</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Detecting structural variations (SVs) at the population level using next-generation sequencing (NGS) requires substantial computational resources and processing time. Here, we compared the performances of 11 SV callers: Delly, Manta, GridSS, Wham, Sniffles, Lumpy, SvABA, Canvas, CNVnator, MELT, and INSurVeyor. These SV callers have been recently published and have been widely employed for processing massive whole-genome sequencing datasets. We evaluated the accuracy, sequence depth, running time, and memory usage of the SV callers.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Notably, several callers exhibited better calling performance for deletions than for duplications, inversions, and insertions. Among the SV callers, Manta identified deletion SVs with better performance and efficient computing r</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC genomics</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10976732</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NRF-2020M3E5D708517212, 2020M3A9I6A0103605713</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NTIS-1711170620</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joe S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yeo MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang JO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Detecting structural variations (SVs) at the population level using next-generation sequencing (NGS) requires substantial computational resources and processing time. Here, we compared the performances of 11 SV callers: Delly, Manta, GridSS, Wham, Sniffles, Lumpy, SvABA, Canvas, CNVnator, MELT, and INSurVeyor. These SV callers have been recently published and have been widely employed for processing massive whole-genome sequencing datasets. We evaluated the accuracy, sequence depth, running time, and memory usage of the SV callers.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Notably, several callers exhibited better calling performance for deletions than for duplications, inversions, and insertions. Among the SV callers, Manta identified deletion SVs with better performance and efficient computing r</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-29T11:21:46.931Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:17:29.345Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10976732</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38549092</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12864-024-10239-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>