<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kamogawa N</submitter><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>895-904</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10978262</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>55(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A</pubmed_abstract><journal>Stroke</journal><pubmed_title>Thrombolysis for Wake-Up Stroke Versus Non-Wake-Up Unwitnessed Stroke: EOS Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10978262</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P41 EB015896</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 NS051343</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bendszus M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molina C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomalla G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Latour L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwamm LH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parsons M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wahlgren N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis Trials (EOS) Investigators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Endres M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsu CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kitazono T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koga M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hacke W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Churilov L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nighoghossian N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jensen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fukuda-Doi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yassi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miwa K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donnan GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiebach JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muir K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toni D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamogawa N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boutitie F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warach S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toyoda K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simonsen CZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thijs V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inoue M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshimura S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leys D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwab S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ringleb P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemmens R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schellinger PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bladin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gerloff C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kleinig T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedraza S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campbell B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ebinger M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Thrombolysis for Wake-Up Stroke Versus Non-Wake-Up Unwitnessed Stroke: EOS Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-01T19:09:39.778Z</modification><creation>2026-05-19T03:07:07.125Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10978262</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38456303</pubmed><doi>10.1161/strokeaha.123.043358</doi><doi>10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043358</doi></cross_references></HashMap>