biostudies-literatureUnknown17Singh SAmong 11,622,528 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations, 892 had a history of heart transplantation (HT). In comparison to AMI admissions without HT, those with prior HT were more frequently complicated with cardiac arrest (8.3 % vs 5.0 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001), acute non-cardiac organ failure (17.4 % vs 9.4 %) (p < 0.001), lower rates of coronary angiography (55.4 % vs 63.6 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001), comparable rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (38.8 % vs 41.5 %, <i>p</i> = 0.10), higher rates of pulmonary artery catheterization (2.7 % vs 1.1 %, p < 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation and acute hemodialysis compared to AMI admissions without HT. Compared to AMI admissions without HT, prior HT recipients had higher in-hospital mortality (11.8 % vs 6.2 %, adjusted odds ratio 2.87 [95 % CI 2.23-3.70]; <i>p</i> < 0.001).American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice100167https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10978363biostudies-literatureAcute myocardial infarction in heart transplant recipients: An 18-year national study.PMC10978363Patlolla SHVallabhajosyula SSundaragiri PRGurumurthy GCheungpasitporn WSingh SfalseAcute myocardial infarction in heart transplant recipients: An 18-year national study.Among 11,622,528 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations, 892 had a history of heart transplantation (HT). In comparison to AMI admissions without HT, those with prior HT were more frequently complicated with cardiac arrest (8.3 % vs 5.0 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001), acute non-cardiac organ failure (17.4 % vs 9.4 %) (p < 0.001), lower rates of coronary angiography (55.4 % vs 63.6 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001), comparable rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (38.8 % vs 41.5 %, <i>p</i> = 0.10), higher rates of pulmonary artery catheterization (2.7 % vs 1.1 %, p < 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation and acute hemodialysis compared to AMI admissions without HT. Compared to AMI admissions without HT, prior HT recipients had higher in-hospital mortality (11.8 % vs 6.2 %, adjusted odds ratio 2.87 [95 % CI 2.23-3.70]; <i>p</i> < 0.001).2022-01-01T00:00:00Z2022 May2025-04-22T08:20:00.074Z2025-04-05T22:30:31.245ZS-EPMC109783633855987510.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100167