<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chikui T</submitter><funding>Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology</funding><pagination>20584601241244777</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10979534</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are widely used in the orofacial region. Furthermore, quantitative analyses have proven useful. However, a few reports have described the correlation between DWI-derived parameters and DCE-MRI-derived parameters, and the results have been controversial.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the correlation among parameters obtained by DWI and DCE-MRI and to compare them between benign and malignant lesions.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>Fifty orofacial lesions were analysed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) were estimated by DWI. For DCE-MRI, TK model analysis was performed to estimate physiological parameters, for example, the influx forward volume transfer constant into the extracellular-extravascular space (EES) (K&lt;sup>trans&lt;/sup>) and fractional volumes of EES and plasma components (ve and vp).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Both ADC and D showed a moderate positive correlation with ve (ρ = 0.640 and 0.645, respectively). K&lt;sup>trans&lt;/sup> showed a marginally weak correlation with f (ρ = 0.296), while vp was not correlated with f or D*; therefore, IVIM perfusion-related parameters and TK model perfusion-related parameters were not straightforward. Both D and ve yielded high diagnostic power between benign lesions and malignant tumours with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.830 and 0.782, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Both D and ve were reliable parameters that were useful for the differential diagnosis. In addition, the true diffusion coefficient (D) was affected by the fractional volume of EES.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Acta radiologica open</journal><pubmed_title>Correlation between diffusion-weighted image-derived parameters and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters in the orofacial region.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10979534</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 18K09770</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chikui T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kiyoshima T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Togao O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshiura K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohga M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawano S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kami Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Correlation between diffusion-weighted image-derived parameters and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters in the orofacial region.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are widely used in the orofacial region. Furthermore, quantitative analyses have proven useful. However, a few reports have described the correlation between DWI-derived parameters and DCE-MRI-derived parameters, and the results have been controversial.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the correlation among parameters obtained by DWI and DCE-MRI and to compare them between benign and malignant lesions.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>Fifty orofacial lesions were analysed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) were estimated by DWI. For DCE-MRI, TK model analysis was performed to estimate physiological parameters, for example, the influx forward volume transfer constant into the extracellular-extravascular space (EES) (K&lt;sup>trans&lt;/sup>) and fractional volumes of EES and plasma components (ve and vp).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Both ADC and D showed a moderate positive correlation with ve (ρ = 0.640 and 0.645, respectively). K&lt;sup>trans&lt;/sup> showed a marginally weak correlation with f (ρ = 0.296), while vp was not correlated with f or D*; therefore, IVIM perfusion-related parameters and TK model perfusion-related parameters were not straightforward. Both D and ve yielded high diagnostic power between benign lesions and malignant tumours with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.830 and 0.782, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Both D and ve were reliable parameters that were useful for the differential diagnosis. In addition, the true diffusion coefficient (D) was affected by the fractional volume of EES.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-22T08:21:28.457Z</modification><creation>2025-04-22T08:21:28.457Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10979534</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38559449</pubmed><doi>10.1177/20584601241244777</doi></cross_references></HashMap>