biostudies-literatureUnknown101(36)Li JWe evaluated the diagnostic performance of both gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver lesions, especially for the detection of small (<2 cm) intrahepatic lesions. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS before liver resection and compared Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS in the detection of focal liver lesions. A total of 216 patients were included, and 309 lesions were found. The sensitivity values of MRI and CEUS for the main lesion were both more than 95%, and the coincidence rates were both more than 80%. Regarding lesions <2 cm, 135 such lesions were detected by MRI, whereas only 85 were detected by CEUS. For lesions <2 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, and coincidence rates of MRI were significantly better than those of CEUS. Among 27 patients, 50 more lesions were detected by MRI than CEUS, 56% (28/50) of which were malignant. For the large lesion, the diagnostic performance is similar between Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS, and the sensitivity and coincidence rates of both methods are high. Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is likely to detect small (<2 cm) focal intrahepatic lesions.Medicinee30482https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10980474biostudies-literatureA comparative study of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of intrahepatic lesion.PMC10980474He SLi JYe XWang JYuan GfalseA comparative study of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of intrahepatic lesion.We evaluated the diagnostic performance of both gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver lesions, especially for the detection of small (<2 cm) intrahepatic lesions. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS before liver resection and compared Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS in the detection of focal liver lesions. A total of 216 patients were included, and 309 lesions were found. The sensitivity values of MRI and CEUS for the main lesion were both more than 95%, and the coincidence rates were both more than 80%. Regarding lesions <2 cm, 135 such lesions were detected by MRI, whereas only 85 were detected by CEUS. For lesions <2 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, and coincidence rates of MRI were significantly better than those of CEUS. Among 27 patients, 50 more lesions were detected by MRI than CEUS, 56% (28/50) of which were malignant. For the large lesion, the diagnostic performance is similar between Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS, and the sensitivity and coincidence rates of both methods are high. Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is likely to detect small (<2 cm) focal intrahepatic lesions.2022-01-01T00:00:00Z2022 Sep2025-04-26T11:21:14.587Z2025-04-06T13:41:00.572ZS-EPMC109804743608671110.1097/MD.0000000000030482