<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(3)</volume><submitter>Asch DA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Antivaccine sentiment is increasingly associated with conservative political positions. Republican-inclined states exhibit lower COVID-19 vaccination rates, but the association between political inclination and reported vaccine adverse events (AEs) is unexplored.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess whether there is an association between state political inclination and the reporting rates of COVID-19 vaccine AEs.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This cross-sectional study used the AE reports after COVID-19 vaccination from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database from 2020 to 2022, with reports after influenza vaccines from 2019 to 2022 used as a reference. These reports were examined against state-level percentage of Republican votes in the 2020 US presidential election.&lt;h4>Exposure&lt;/h4>State-level percentage of Republican votes in the 2020 US presidential election.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Rates of any AE among COVID-19 vaccine recipients, rates of any severe AE among vaccine recipients, and the proportion of AEs reported as severe.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 620 456 AE reports (mean [SD] age of vaccine recipients, 51.8 [17.6] years; 435 797 reports from women [70.2%]; a vaccine recipient could potentially file more than 1 report, so reports are not necessarily from unique individuals) for COVID-19 vaccination were identified from the VAERS database. Significant associations between state political inclination and state AE reporting were observed for all 3 outcomes: a 10% increase in Republican voting was associated with increased odds of AE reports (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05; P &lt; .001), severe AE reports (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.26; P &lt; .001), and the proportion of AEs reported as severe (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; P &lt; .001). These associations were seen across all age strata in stratified analyses and were more pronounced among older subpopulations.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>This cross-sectional study found that the more states were inclined to vote Republican, the more likely their vaccine recipients or their clinicians reported COVID-19 vaccine AEs. These results suggest that either the perception of vaccine AEs or the motivation to report them was associated with political inclination.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e244177</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10980960</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Reports of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events in Predominantly Republican vs Democratic States.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10980960</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Asch DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luo C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reports of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events in Predominantly Republican vs Democratic States.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Antivaccine sentiment is increasingly associated with conservative political positions. Republican-inclined states exhibit lower COVID-19 vaccination rates, but the association between political inclination and reported vaccine adverse events (AEs) is unexplored.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess whether there is an association between state political inclination and the reporting rates of COVID-19 vaccine AEs.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This cross-sectional study used the AE reports after COVID-19 vaccination from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database from 2020 to 2022, with reports after influenza vaccines from 2019 to 2022 used as a reference. These reports were examined against state-level percentage of Republican votes in the 2020 US presidential election.&lt;h4>Exposure&lt;/h4>State-level percentage of Republican votes in the 2020 US presidential election.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Rates of any AE among COVID-19 vaccine recipients, rates of any severe AE among vaccine recipients, and the proportion of AEs reported as severe.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 620 456 AE reports (mean [SD] age of vaccine recipients, 51.8 [17.6] years; 435 797 reports from women [70.2%]; a vaccine recipient could potentially file more than 1 report, so reports are not necessarily from unique individuals) for COVID-19 vaccination were identified from the VAERS database. Significant associations between state political inclination and state AE reporting were observed for all 3 outcomes: a 10% increase in Republican voting was associated with increased odds of AE reports (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05; P &lt; .001), severe AE reports (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.26; P &lt; .001), and the proportion of AEs reported as severe (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; P &lt; .001). These associations were seen across all age strata in stratified analyses and were more pronounced among older subpopulations.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>This cross-sectional study found that the more states were inclined to vote Republican, the more likely their vaccine recipients or their clinicians reported COVID-19 vaccine AEs. These results suggest that either the perception of vaccine AEs or the motivation to report them was associated with political inclination.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-22T21:31:54.474Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T03:33:47.356Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10980960</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38551560</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4177</doi></cross_references></HashMap>