<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(3)</volume><submitter>Liu R</submitter><funding>Stanford University</funding><funding>Roche</funding><pubmed_abstract>Patients with cancer may be given treatments that are not officially approved (off-label) or recommended by guidelines (off-guideline). Here we present a data science framework to systematically characterize off-label and off-guideline usages using real-world data from de-identified electronic health records (EHR). We analyze treatment patterns in 165,912 US patients with 14 common cancer types. We find that 18.6% and 4.4% of patients have received at least one line of off-label and off-guideline cancer drugs, respectively. Patients with worse performance status, in later lines, or treated at academic hospitals are significantly more likely to receive off-label and off-guideline drugs. To quantify how predictable off-guideline usage is, we developed machine learning models to predict which</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cell reports. Medicine</journal><pagination>101444</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10983036</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Systematic analysis of off-label and off-guideline cancer therapy usage in a real-world cohort of 165,912 US patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10983036</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zou J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Waliany S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGough S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rizzo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin YG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Copping R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garmhausen MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neal J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pal N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Systematic analysis of off-label and off-guideline cancer therapy usage in a real-world cohort of 165,912 US patients.</name><description>Patients with cancer may be given treatments that are not officially approved (off-label) or recommended by guidelines (off-guideline). Here we present a data science framework to systematically characterize off-label and off-guideline usages using real-world data from de-identified electronic health records (EHR). We analyze treatment patterns in 165,912 US patients with 14 common cancer types. We find that 18.6% and 4.4% of patients have received at least one line of off-label and off-guideline cancer drugs, respectively. Patients with worse performance status, in later lines, or treated at academic hospitals are significantly more likely to receive off-label and off-guideline drugs. To quantify how predictable off-guideline usage is, we developed machine learning models to predict which</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Mar</publication><modification>2025-05-29T19:27:57.643Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T19:27:57.643Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10983036</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38428426</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101444</doi></cross_references></HashMap>