<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>El Zarif T</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH</funding><pagination>1605-1615</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11032703</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>115(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-side</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</journal><pubmed_title>Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer: report from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11032703</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233328</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 AI163412</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR004419</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 CA247815</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Maruzzo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simon N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nassar AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roviello G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pettaway CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gheeya J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellano D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriguez PA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stahlfeld C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buti S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdel-Wahab N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanesvaran R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farolfi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hahn AW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niglio S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vincenzi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matthews H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Freeman D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Apolo AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hui G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khaki AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhuang TZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harrison MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McKay RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adra N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Am E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drakaki A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Velev M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pond GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Appleman L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gernone A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cortellini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piedra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milowsky MI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Necchi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sonpavde GP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antonuzzo L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Velasco G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glover M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tu SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mouhieddine TH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choueiri TK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giudice GC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barata P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis NB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nazha B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spiess PE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flippot R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Zarif T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Master V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mittra A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer: report from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-side</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-01T20:15:04.747Z</modification><creation>2026-05-20T03:08:36.099Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11032703</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37563779</pubmed><doi>10.1093/jnci/djad155</doi></cross_references></HashMap>