<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ogwo C</submitter><funding>Cary Kleinman Oral Health Sciences Research Fund</funding><funding>Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation</funding><funding>NIDCR NIH HHS</funding><funding>Wefel award from the University of Iowa College of Dentistry</funding><funding>NCRR NIH HHS</funding><funding>Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust</funding><funding>Post-Comprehensive Graduate Research award from the University of Iowa Graduate College</funding><funding>National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research</funding><pagination>529</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11069237</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To predict the dental caries outcomes in young adults from a set of longitudinally-obtained predictor variables and identify the most important predictors using machine learning techniques.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted using the Iowa Fluoride Study dataset. The predictor variables - sex, mother's education, family income, composite socio-economic status (SES), caries experience at ages 9, 13, and 17, and the cumulative estimates of risk and protective factors, including fluoride, dietary, and behavioral variables from ages 5-9, 9-13, 13-17, and 17-23 were used to predict the age 23 D&lt;sub>2+&lt;/sub>MFS count. The following machine learning models (LASSO regression, generalized boosting machines (GBM), negative binomial (NegGLM), and extreme gradient boosting models (XGBOOST)) were compared under 5-fold cross validation with nested resampling techniques.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The prevalence of cavitated level caries experience at age 23 (mean D&lt;sub>2+&lt;/sub>MFS count) was 4.75. The predictive analysis found LASSO to be the best performing model (compared to GBM, NegGLM, and XGBOOST), with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.70, and coefficient of determination (R&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) of 0.44. After dichotomization of the predicted and observed values of the LASSO regression, the classification results showed accuracy, precision, recall, and ROC AUC of 83.7%, 85.9%, 93.1%, 68.2%, respectively. Previous caries experience at age 13 and age 17 and sugar-sweetened beverages intakes at age 13 and age 17 were found to be the four most important predictors of cavitated caries count at age 23.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our machine learning model showed high accuracy and precision in the prediction of caries in young adults from a longitudinally-obtained predictor variables. Our model could, in the future, after further development and validation with other diverse population data, be used by public health specialists and policy-makers as a screening tool to identify the risk of caries in young adults and apply more targeted interventions. However, data from a more diverse population are needed to improve the quality and generalizability of caries prediction.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC oral health</journal><pubmed_title>Predicting dental caries outcomes in young adults using machine learning approach.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11069237</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UL1 RR024979</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-DE09551, R01-DE12101, M01-RR00059, UL1-RR024979</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>M01 RR000059</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DE012101</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DE009551</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ogwo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caplan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levy S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warren J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Predicting dental caries outcomes in young adults using machine learning approach.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To predict the dental caries outcomes in young adults from a set of longitudinally-obtained predictor variables and identify the most important predictors using machine learning techniques.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted using the Iowa Fluoride Study dataset. The predictor variables - sex, mother's education, family income, composite socio-economic status (SES), caries experience at ages 9, 13, and 17, and the cumulative estimates of risk and protective factors, including fluoride, dietary, and behavioral variables from ages 5-9, 9-13, 13-17, and 17-23 were used to predict the age 23 D&lt;sub>2+&lt;/sub>MFS count. The following machine learning models (LASSO regression, generalized boosting machines (GBM), negative binomial (NegGLM), and extreme gradient boosting models (XGBOOST)) were compared under 5-fold cross validation with nested resampling techniques.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The prevalence of cavitated level caries experience at age 23 (mean D&lt;sub>2+&lt;/sub>MFS count) was 4.75. The predictive analysis found LASSO to be the best performing model (compared to GBM, NegGLM, and XGBOOST), with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.70, and coefficient of determination (R&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) of 0.44. After dichotomization of the predicted and observed values of the LASSO regression, the classification results showed accuracy, precision, recall, and ROC AUC of 83.7%, 85.9%, 93.1%, 68.2%, respectively. Previous caries experience at age 13 and age 17 and sugar-sweetened beverages intakes at age 13 and age 17 were found to be the four most important predictors of cavitated caries count at age 23.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our machine learning model showed high accuracy and precision in the prediction of caries in young adults from a longitudinally-obtained predictor variables. Our model could, in the future, after further development and validation with other diverse population data, be used by public health specialists and policy-makers as a screening tool to identify the risk of caries in young adults and apply more targeted interventions. However, data from a more diverse population are needed to improve the quality and generalizability of caries prediction.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2026-03-17T16:12:43.295Z</modification><creation>2025-08-18T09:53:16.379Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11069237</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38702639</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12903-024-04294-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>