<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ozaki Y</submitter><funding>European Research Council</funding><pagination>eadm9797</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11095461</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(20)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Both music and language are found in all known human societies, yet no studies have compared similarities and differences between song, speech, and instrumental music on a global scale. In this Registered Report, we analyzed two global datasets: (i) 300 annotated audio recordings representing matched sets of traditional songs, recited lyrics, conversational speech, and instrumental melodies from our 75 coauthors speaking 55 languages; and (ii) 418 previously published adult-directed song and speech recordings from 209 individuals speaking 16 languages. Of our six preregistered predictions, five were strongly supported: Relative to speech, songs use (i) higher pitch, (ii) slower temporal rate, and (iii) more stable pitches, while both songs and speech used similar (iv) pitch interval size a</pubmed_abstract><journal>Science advances</journal><pubmed_title>Globally, songs and instrumental melodies are slower and higher and use more stable pitches than speech: A Registered Report.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11095461</pmcid><funding_grant_id>678733</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>101045747</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Nguqu N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Kahla I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parselelo ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zar SZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varnosfaderani SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiba G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozaki Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fujii S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lomsadze T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Setiawan IPG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sadaphal PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arhine A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meachair TO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsope C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sy L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lekakul G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Proutskova P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sadaphal DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anglada-Tort M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fredriksson D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sagarzazu NB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeng M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravignani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hegde S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>der Nederlanden CVB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kolff K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rocamora M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ehara U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chhatwal M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krzyzanowski W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soto-Silva I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitch WT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dessiatnitchenko P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larrouy-Maestri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Purdy SC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kurdova D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Tongeren M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varella MAC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benetos E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hadavi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Natsitsabui R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacoby N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haiduk F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Opondo P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarbah JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Borsan VN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muslu O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shcherbakova O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naruse M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hansen NC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barbosa BS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silva-Zurita J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raviv L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hereld D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuikuro U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>David RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McBride JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Troy J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nweke F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loui P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruder C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tierney A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Canon JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pfordresher PQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magalhaes V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thorne R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ambrazevicius R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teyxokawa TP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Færovik U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arabadjiev A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Millalonco NEM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jadoul Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savage PE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Globally, songs and instrumental melodies are slower and higher and use more stable pitches than speech: A Registered Report.</name><description>Both music and language are found in all known human societies, yet no studies have compared similarities and differences between song, speech, and instrumental music on a global scale. In this Registered Report, we analyzed two global datasets: (i) 300 annotated audio recordings representing matched sets of traditional songs, recited lyrics, conversational speech, and instrumental melodies from our 75 coauthors speaking 55 languages; and (ii) 418 previously published adult-directed song and speech recordings from 209 individuals speaking 16 languages. Of our six preregistered predictions, five were strongly supported: Relative to speech, songs use (i) higher pitch, (ii) slower temporal rate, and (iii) more stable pitches, while both songs and speech used similar (iv) pitch interval size a</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2026-06-01T19:58:09.255Z</modification><creation>2026-05-20T03:07:54.447Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11095461</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38748798</pubmed><doi>10.1126/sciadv.adm9797</doi></cross_references></HashMap>