<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Le Pennec R</submitter><funding>Brest University Hospital</funding><funding>International Network of Venous Thromboembolism Research Networks</funding><pagination>e075712</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11097801</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a challenge to diagnose and when missed, exposes patients to potentially fatal recurrent events. Beyond CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan, single photon emission CT (SPECT) V/Q emerged a new diagnostic modality of scintigraphic acquisition that has been reported to improve diagnostic performances. To date, no management outcome study or randomised trial evaluated an algorithm based on SPECT V/Q for PE diagnosis. We present the design of a randomised multicentre, international management study comparing SPECT V/Q with validated strategies.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>We will include a total of 3672 patients with suspected PE requiring chest imaging, randomised into three different groups, each using a </pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of three diagnostic strategies for suspicion of pulmonary embolism: planar ventilation-perfusion scan (V/Q), CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and single photon emission CT ventilation-perfusion scan (SPECT V/Q): a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11097801</pmcid><funding_grant_id>N/A</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Le Roux PY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salaun PY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robin P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Righini M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Gal G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Pennec R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Couturaud F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of three diagnostic strategies for suspicion of pulmonary embolism: planar ventilation-perfusion scan (V/Q), CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and single photon emission CT ventilation-perfusion scan (SPECT V/Q): a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a challenge to diagnose and when missed, exposes patients to potentially fatal recurrent events. Beyond CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan, single photon emission CT (SPECT) V/Q emerged a new diagnostic modality of scintigraphic acquisition that has been reported to improve diagnostic performances. To date, no management outcome study or randomised trial evaluated an algorithm based on SPECT V/Q for PE diagnosis. We present the design of a randomised multicentre, international management study comparing SPECT V/Q with validated strategies.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>We will include a total of 3672 patients with suspected PE requiring chest imaging, randomised into three different groups, each using a </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2026-06-02T11:25:26.085Z</modification><creation>2026-05-27T03:07:44.974Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11097801</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38754880</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075712</doi></cross_references></HashMap>