<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Stroet M</submitter><funding>Bundesministerium f?r Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort</funding><funding>Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft</funding><funding>?sterreichische Nationalstiftung f?r Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung</funding><funding>Australian Research Data Commons</funding><funding>Australian Research Council</funding><pagination>4602-4620</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11103706</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(19)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Molecular dynamics simulations depend critically on the quality of the force field used to describe the interatomic interactions and the extent to which it has been validated for use in a specific application. Using a curated test set of 52 high-resolution structures, 39 derived from X-ray diffraction and 13 solved using NMR, we consider the extent to which different parameter sets of the GROMOS protein force field can be distinguished based on comparing a range of structural criteria, including the number of backbone hydrogen bonds, the number of native hydrogen bonds, polar and nonpolar solvent-accessible surface area, radius of gyration, the prevalence of secondary structure elements, &lt;i>J&lt;/i>-coupling constants, nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) intensities, positional root-mean-square d</pubmed_abstract><journal>The journal of physical chemistry. B</journal><pubmed_title>On the Validation of Protein Force Fields Based on Structural Criteria.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11103706</pmcid><funding_grant_id>DP150101097</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DP723</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DP180101421</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Malde AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stroet M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van den Bergen G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mark AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sykacek P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Setz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oostenbrink C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>On the Validation of Protein Force Fields Based on Structural Criteria.</name><description>Molecular dynamics simulations depend critically on the quality of the force field used to describe the interatomic interactions and the extent to which it has been validated for use in a specific application. Using a curated test set of 52 high-resolution structures, 39 derived from X-ray diffraction and 13 solved using NMR, we consider the extent to which different parameter sets of the GROMOS protein force field can be distinguished based on comparing a range of structural criteria, including the number of backbone hydrogen bonds, the number of native hydrogen bonds, polar and nonpolar solvent-accessible surface area, radius of gyration, the prevalence of secondary structure elements, &lt;i>J&lt;/i>-coupling constants, nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) intensities, positional root-mean-square d</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2026-06-02T10:28:23.352Z</modification><creation>2026-05-26T03:06:47.286Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11103706</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38711373</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c08469</doi></cross_references></HashMap>