<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Gotora PT</submitter><funding>Poliomyelitis Research Foundation</funding><funding>North-West University</funding><funding>National Research Foundation</funding><pagination>144</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11202254</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>HIV-1 produces Tat, a crucial protein for transcription, viral replication, and CNS neurotoxicity. Tat interacts with TAR, enhancing HIV reverse transcription. Subtype C Tat variants (C31S, R57S, Q63E) are associated with reduced transactivation and neurovirulence compared to subtype B. However, their precise impact on Tat-TAR binding is unclear. This study investigates how these substitutions affect Tat-TAR interaction.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We utilized molecular modelling techniques, including MODELLER, to produce precise three-dimensional structures of HIV-1 Tat protein variants. We utilized Tat subtype B as the reference or wild type, and generated Tat variants to mirror those amino acid variants found in Tat subtype C. Subtype C-specific amino acid substitutions were selected based on their role in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1. Subsequently, we conducted molecular docking of each Tat protein variant to TAR using HDOCK, followed by molecular dynamic simulations.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Molecular docking results indicated that Tat subtype B (TatWt) showed the highest affinity for the TAR element (-262.07), followed by TatC31S (-261.61), TatQ63E (-256.43), TatC31S/R57S/Q63E (-238.92), and TatR57S (-222.24). However, binding free energy analysis showed higher affinities for single variants TatQ63E (-349.2 ± 10.4 kcal/mol) and TatR57S (-290.0 ± 9.6 kcal/mol) compared to TatWt (-247.9 ± 27.7 kcal/mol), while TatC31S and TatC31S/R57SQ/63E showed lower values. Interactions over the protein trajectory were also higher for TatQ63E and TatR57S compared to TatWt, TatC31S, and TatC31S/R57SQ/63E, suggesting that modifying amino acids within the Arginine/Glutamine-rich region notably affects TAR interaction. Single amino acid mutations TatR57S and TatQ63E had a significant impact, while TatC31S had minimal effect. Introducing single amino acid variants from TatWt to a more representative Tat subtype C (TatC31S/R57SQ/63E) resulted in lower predicted binding affinity, consistent with previous findings.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These identified amino acid positions likely contribute significantly to Tat-TAR interaction and the differential pathogenesis and neuropathogenesis observed between subtype B and subtype C. Additional experimental investigations should prioritize exploring the influence of these amino acid signatures on TAR binding to gain a comprehensive understanding of their impact on viral transactivation, potentially identifying them as therapeutic targets.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Virology journal</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of subtype C-specific amino acid variants on HIV-1 Tat-TAR interaction: insights from molecular modelling and dynamics.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11202254</pmcid><funding_grant_id>TTK22031652</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>23/84</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>van der Sluis R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin DR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cloete R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gotora PT</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of subtype C-specific amino acid variants on HIV-1 Tat-TAR interaction: insights from molecular modelling and dynamics.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>HIV-1 produces Tat, a crucial protein for transcription, viral replication, and CNS neurotoxicity. Tat interacts with TAR, enhancing HIV reverse transcription. Subtype C Tat variants (C31S, R57S, Q63E) are associated with reduced transactivation and neurovirulence compared to subtype B. However, their precise impact on Tat-TAR binding is unclear. This study investigates how these substitutions affect Tat-TAR interaction.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We utilized molecular modelling techniques, including MODELLER, to produce precise three-dimensional structures of HIV-1 Tat protein variants. We utilized Tat subtype B as the reference or wild type, and generated Tat variants to mirror those amino acid variants found in Tat subtype C. Subtype C-specific amino acid substitutions were selected based on their role in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1. Subsequently, we conducted molecular docking of each Tat protein variant to TAR using HDOCK, followed by molecular dynamic simulations.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Molecular docking results indicated that Tat subtype B (TatWt) showed the highest affinity for the TAR element (-262.07), followed by TatC31S (-261.61), TatQ63E (-256.43), TatC31S/R57S/Q63E (-238.92), and TatR57S (-222.24). However, binding free energy analysis showed higher affinities for single variants TatQ63E (-349.2 ± 10.4 kcal/mol) and TatR57S (-290.0 ± 9.6 kcal/mol) compared to TatWt (-247.9 ± 27.7 kcal/mol), while TatC31S and TatC31S/R57SQ/63E showed lower values. Interactions over the protein trajectory were also higher for TatQ63E and TatR57S compared to TatWt, TatC31S, and TatC31S/R57SQ/63E, suggesting that modifying amino acids within the Arginine/Glutamine-rich region notably affects TAR interaction. Single amino acid mutations TatR57S and TatQ63E had a significant impact, while TatC31S had minimal effect. Introducing single amino acid variants from TatWt to a more representative Tat subtype C (TatC31S/R57SQ/63E) resulted in lower predicted binding affinity, consistent with previous findings.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These identified amino acid positions likely contribute significantly to Tat-TAR interaction and the differential pathogenesis and neuropathogenesis observed between subtype B and subtype C. Additional experimental investigations should prioritize exploring the influence of these amino acid signatures on TAR binding to gain a comprehensive understanding of their impact on viral transactivation, potentially identifying them as therapeutic targets.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2026-06-01T23:48:37.723Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:16:23.242Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11202254</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38918875</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12985-024-02419-6</doi></cross_references></HashMap>