{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["3(1)"],"submitter":["Marazia C"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Consent to treatment is a cornerstone of medical ethics and law. Nevertheless, very little empirical evidence is available to inform clinicians and policymakers regarding the capacities of forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) to make decisions about their treatment, with the risk of clinical and legal inertia, silent coercion, stigmatization, or ill-conceived reforms.<h4>Study design</h4>In this multinational study, we assessed and compared with treatment-related decisional capacities in forensic and non-forensic patients with SSD. 160 forensic and 139 non-forensic patients were used in Austria, Germany, Italy, Poland, and England. Their capacity to consent to treatment was assessed by means of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatm"],"journal":["Schizophrenia bulletin open"],"pagination":["sgac037"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11205899"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Treatment Decision-Making Capacity in Forensic vs Non-forensic Psychiatric Patients: A European Comparison."],"pmcid":["PMC11205899"],"pubmed_authors":["Heitzman J","Markiewicz I","de Girolamo G","Wancata J","Gosek P","Marazia C","Fangerau H","Voßberg D","Macis A","Appelbaum PS","Rucci P","Iommi M","Ferrari C","Rolfes V","Iozzino L","Salize HJ","Picchioni M","Stompe T"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Treatment Decision-Making Capacity in Forensic vs Non-forensic Psychiatric Patients: A European Comparison.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Consent to treatment is a cornerstone of medical ethics and law. Nevertheless, very little empirical evidence is available to inform clinicians and policymakers regarding the capacities of forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) to make decisions about their treatment, with the risk of clinical and legal inertia, silent coercion, stigmatization, or ill-conceived reforms.<h4>Study design</h4>In this multinational study, we assessed and compared with treatment-related decisional capacities in forensic and non-forensic patients with SSD. 160 forensic and 139 non-forensic patients were used in Austria, Germany, Italy, Poland, and England. Their capacity to consent to treatment was assessed by means of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatm","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Jan","modification":"2025-04-03T21:31:06.298Z","creation":"2025-04-03T21:31:06.298Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11205899","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39144784"],"doi":["10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac037"]}}