<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chun SG</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1111-1115</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11211986</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>The optimal radiotherapy technique for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial, so evaluating long-term prospective outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is important.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare long-term prospective outcomes of patients receiving IMRT and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel for locally advanced NSCLC.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>A secondary analysis of a prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial NRG Oncology-RTOG 0617 assessed 483 patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (3D-CRT vs IMRT) for locally advanced NSCLC based on stratification.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Long-term outcomes were analyzed, including overall survival (OS)</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Long-Term Prospective Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11211986</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R50 CA275822</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180868</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180822</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233330</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kavadi VS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bogart JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raben A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dobelbower MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chun SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosch W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Augspurger ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schild SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paulus R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rothman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bradley JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacRae RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Narayan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iyengar P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robinson C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Timmerman RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Komaki RU</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-Term Prospective Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>The optimal radiotherapy technique for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial, so evaluating long-term prospective outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is important.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare long-term prospective outcomes of patients receiving IMRT and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel for locally advanced NSCLC.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>A secondary analysis of a prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial NRG Oncology-RTOG 0617 assessed 483 patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (3D-CRT vs IMRT) for locally advanced NSCLC based on stratification.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Long-term outcomes were analyzed, including overall survival (OS)</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Aug</publication><modification>2026-06-01T12:02:51.92Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T12:00:48.264Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11211986</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38935373</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1841</doi></cross_references></HashMap>