<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>165(5)</volume><submitter>Lilly CM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Machine learning (ML)-derived notifications for impending episodes of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure events are interesting because they can alert physicians in time to intervene before these complications occur.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>Do ML alerts, telemedicine system (TS)-generated alerts, or biomedical monitors (BMs) have superior performance for predicting episodes of intubation or administration of vasopressors?&lt;h4>Study design and methods&lt;/h4>An ML algorithm was trained to predict intubation and vasopressor initiation events among critically ill adults. Its performance was compared with BM alarms and TS alerts.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>ML notifications were substantially more accurate and precise, with 50-fold lower alarm burden than TS alerts for predicti</pubmed_abstract><journal>Chest</journal><pagination>1139-1148</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11214904</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Application of Machine Learning Models to Biomedical and Information System Signals From Critically Ill Adults.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11214904</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chen O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lilly CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lipsky A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kirk D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lieder I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blum JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cucchi EW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pessach IM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lotun G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Celniker G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Application of Machine Learning Models to Biomedical and Information System Signals From Critically Ill Adults.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Machine learning (ML)-derived notifications for impending episodes of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure events are interesting because they can alert physicians in time to intervene before these complications occur.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>Do ML alerts, telemedicine system (TS)-generated alerts, or biomedical monitors (BMs) have superior performance for predicting episodes of intubation or administration of vasopressors?&lt;h4>Study design and methods&lt;/h4>An ML algorithm was trained to predict intubation and vasopressor initiation events among critically ill adults. Its performance was compared with BM alarms and TS alerts.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>ML notifications were substantially more accurate and precise, with 50-fold lower alarm burden than TS alerts for predicti</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 May</publication><modification>2025-07-12T03:06:00.463Z</modification><creation>2025-07-12T03:06:00.463Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11214904</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37923292</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.036</doi></cross_references></HashMap>