<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>El Jamal C</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>FIC NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAAA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCCIH NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>RRD VA</funding><funding>NINR NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1328-1335</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11218548</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Few studies have investigated tolerability, blinding, and double-blinding of High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) at amplitudes above 2 milliamps (mA).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We examined a) tolerability of HD-tDCS during stimulation sessions and b) blinding and double blinding of participants and study team members.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data from a mixed neurologic sample of 292 older adults were pooled from 3046 HD-tDCS sessions (2329 active; 717 sham). Per electrode amplitudes ranged from 1 mA to 4 mA with total currents up to 10 mA. Participants completed a standardized sensation (tolerability) questionnaire after each session. Participants and study team members stated whether the participant received active or sham stimulation at the end of various </pubmed_abstract><journal>Brain stimulation</journal><pubmed_title>Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11218548</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AG058724</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG053760</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>D43 TW009883</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AT006978</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 GM136499</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA102667</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001427</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS101362</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R35 AG072262</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AT010060</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS094413</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 DK063179</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 HL039707</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T34 GM137858</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 HL087226</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA016151</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG3 DA048502</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI098511</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 ES010126</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>I01 RX001534</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG024832</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NR016093</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08 AI051565</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG066511</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 NR016914</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS112996</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bikson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iordan AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahman-Filipiak A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harrie A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DaSilva AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Jamal C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hampstead BM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vesia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ploutz-Snyder R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khadr L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Few studies have investigated tolerability, blinding, and double-blinding of High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) at amplitudes above 2 milliamps (mA).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We examined a) tolerability of HD-tDCS during stimulation sessions and b) blinding and double blinding of participants and study team members.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data from a mixed neurologic sample of 292 older adults were pooled from 3046 HD-tDCS sessions (2329 active; 717 sham). Per electrode amplitudes ranged from 1 mA to 4 mA with total currents up to 10 mA. Participants completed a standardized sensation (tolerability) questionnaire after each session. Participants and study team members stated whether the participant received active or sham stimulation at the end of various </description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Sep-Oct</publication><modification>2026-04-30T21:28:05.94Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:22:08.129Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11218548</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37660936</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.025</doi></cross_references></HashMap>