<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hong N</submitter><funding>Seoul National University-Seoul Metropolitan Government (SNU-SMG) Boramae Medical Center</funding><pagination>163-173</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11220293</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to investigate the incidence of flow arrest during carotid artery stenting (CAS) with filter-type embolic protection device (EPD), identify any predisposing factors for those situations, and contemplate intraprocedural precautionary steps.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>CAS was performed in 128 patients with 132 arteries using filter-type EPD. The characteristics of treated patients and arteries were compared between groups with and without flow arrest.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The incidence of flow arrest during CAS with filter-type EPD was 17.4%. In flow arrest group, cases of vulnerable plaques (p=0.02) and symptomatic lesions (p=0.01) were significantly more common, and there were more cases of debris captured by EPD in a planar pattern (p&lt;0.01). Vulnerable plaques were significantly </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery</journal><pubmed_title>Flow arrest during carotid artery stenting with a distal embolic protection device: A single-center experience and clinical implications.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11220293</pmcid><funding_grant_id>04-2023-0022</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hong N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Son YJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Flow arrest during carotid artery stenting with a distal embolic protection device: A single-center experience and clinical implications.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to investigate the incidence of flow arrest during carotid artery stenting (CAS) with filter-type embolic protection device (EPD), identify any predisposing factors for those situations, and contemplate intraprocedural precautionary steps.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>CAS was performed in 128 patients with 132 arteries using filter-type EPD. The characteristics of treated patients and arteries were compared between groups with and without flow arrest.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The incidence of flow arrest during CAS with filter-type EPD was 17.4%. In flow arrest group, cases of vulnerable plaques (p=0.02) and symptomatic lesions (p=0.01) were significantly more common, and there were more cases of debris captured by EPD in a planar pattern (p&lt;0.01). Vulnerable plaques were significantly </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T12:06:32.045Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:12:24.909Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11220293</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38403575</pubmed><doi>10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.10.001</doi></cross_references></HashMap>