<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhou S</submitter><funding>Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital Clinical Research 5010 Program</funding><pagination>e079940</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11227769</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(7)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double flap technique (LPG-DFT) reconstruction has been used for proximal early gastric cancer in recent years. However, its feasibility and safety remain uncertain, as only a few retrospective studies have contained postoperative complications and long-term survival data. LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer is still in the early stages of research. Large-scale, prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to assess the value of LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, RCT that investigates the antireflux effect of LPG-DFT compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (LTG-RY) reconstruction for proximal early g</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Comparing the antireflux effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique reconstruction versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11227769</pmcid><funding_grant_id>SYSKY-2022-276-02</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Xie Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhong G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhong L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparing the antireflux effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique reconstruction versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double flap technique (LPG-DFT) reconstruction has been used for proximal early gastric cancer in recent years. However, its feasibility and safety remain uncertain, as only a few retrospective studies have contained postoperative complications and long-term survival data. LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer is still in the early stages of research. Large-scale, prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to assess the value of LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, RCT that investigates the antireflux effect of LPG-DFT compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (LTG-RY) reconstruction for proximal early g</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2026-06-01T20:32:40.19Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T08:21:51.235Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11227769</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38964794</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079940</doi></cross_references></HashMap>