<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Mathian E</submitter><funding>INCa</funding><funding>Worldwide Cancer Research</funding><funding>NETRF</funding><pagination>103591</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11233924</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Six thoracic pathologists reviewed 259 lung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) from the lungNENomics project, with 171 of them having associated survival data. This cohort presents a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and limitations of current World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria and to evaluate the utility of emerging markers.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients were diagnosed based on the 2021 WHO criteria, with atypical carcinoids (ACs) defined by the presence of focal necrosis and/or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>. We investigated two markers of tumour proliferation: the Ki-67 index and phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) protein expression, quantified by pathologists and automatically via deep learning. Additionally, an unsupervised deep learning a</pubmed_abstract><journal>ESMO open</journal><pubmed_title>Assessment of the current and emerging criteria for the histopathological classification of lung neuroendocrine tumours in the lungNENomics project.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11233924</pmcid><funding_grant_id>21-0005</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Moonen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Centonze G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pelosi G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vignaud JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tabone-Eglinger S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alcala N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brustugun OT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berthet JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Montpreville VT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>di Micco CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lantuejoul S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graziano P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foll M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sabella G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dingemans AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mansuet-Lupo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fournier CB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drouet Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Altun C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lund-Iversen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Voegele C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popper H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roz L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fadel E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lacomme S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Speel EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Girard N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sexton-Oates A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gadot N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chalabreysse L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rousseau N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perrin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brcic L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mangiante L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Damiola F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mathian E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milione M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofman V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Volante M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez-Cuesta L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Derks J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papotti MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Planchard G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muscarella LA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Assessment of the current and emerging criteria for the histopathological classification of lung neuroendocrine tumours in the lungNENomics project.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Six thoracic pathologists reviewed 259 lung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) from the lungNENomics project, with 171 of them having associated survival data. This cohort presents a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and limitations of current World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria and to evaluate the utility of emerging markers.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients were diagnosed based on the 2021 WHO criteria, with atypical carcinoids (ACs) defined by the presence of focal necrosis and/or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>. We investigated two markers of tumour proliferation: the Ki-67 index and phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) protein expression, quantified by pathologists and automatically via deep learning. Additionally, an unsupervised deep learning a</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-05T15:47:53.947Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T15:47:53.947Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11233924</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38878324</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103591</doi></cross_references></HashMap>