<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Burdorf RM</submitter><funding>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</funding><funding>UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>86-94</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11272071</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>230(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The association between low-frequency human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and treatment failure (TF) is controversial. We explore this association using next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods that accurately sample low-frequency DRMs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We enrolled women with HIV-1 in Malawi who were either antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive (cohort A), had ART failure (cohort B), or had discontinued ART (cohort C). At entry, cohorts A and C began a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen and cohort B started a protease inhibitor-based regimen. We used Primer ID MiSeq to identify regimen-relevant DRMs in entry and TF plasma samples, and a Cox proportional hazards model to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for entry DRMs. Low-frequency DRMs were defined as ≤20%.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We sequenced 360 participants. Cohort B and C participants were more likely to have TF than cohort A participants. The presence of K103N at entry significantly increased TF risk among A and C participants at both high and low frequency, with HRs of 3.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.18) and 2.38 (95% CI, 1.00-5.67), respectively. At TF, 45% of participants showed selection of DRMs while in the remaining participants there was an apparent lack of selective pressure from ART.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Using accurate NGS for DRM detection may benefit an additional 10% of patients by identifying low-frequency K103N mutations.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of infectious diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of Low-Frequency Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance Mutations on Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11272071</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01-HD080485</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AI050410</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI140970</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016086</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-AI40970</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-AI050410</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-CA016086</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Maliwichi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swanstrom R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chagomerana MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jumbe A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wallie S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Long N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amon C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adams L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burdorf RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tegha G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hosseinipour MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill CS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of Low-Frequency Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance Mutations on Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The association between low-frequency human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and treatment failure (TF) is controversial. We explore this association using next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods that accurately sample low-frequency DRMs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We enrolled women with HIV-1 in Malawi who were either antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive (cohort A), had ART failure (cohort B), or had discontinued ART (cohort C). At entry, cohorts A and C began a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen and cohort B started a protease inhibitor-based regimen. We used Primer ID MiSeq to identify regimen-relevant DRMs in entry and TF plasma samples, and a Cox proportional hazards model to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for entry DRMs. Low-frequency DRMs were defined as ≤20%.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We sequenced 360 participants. Cohort B and C participants were more likely to have TF than cohort A participants. The presence of K103N at entry significantly increased TF risk among A and C participants at both high and low frequency, with HRs of 3.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.18) and 2.38 (95% CI, 1.00-5.67), respectively. At TF, 45% of participants showed selection of DRMs while in the remaining participants there was an apparent lack of selective pressure from ART.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Using accurate NGS for DRM detection may benefit an additional 10% of patients by identifying low-frequency K103N mutations.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-04T02:21:54.981Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T02:21:54.981Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11272071</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39052733</pubmed><doi>10.1093/infdis/jiae131</doi></cross_references></HashMap>