<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(2)</volume><submitter>Tebaldi M</submitter><funding>Boston Scientific</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recently, questions around the efficacy and effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) have arisen in various clinical settings.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The Clinical Outcome of FFR-guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions (HALE-BOPP) study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international prospective study enrolling patients who underwent FFR measurement on at least one vessel. In accordance with the decision-making workflow and treatment, the vessels were classified in three subgroups: (i) angio-revascularized, (ii) FFR-revascularized, (iii) FFR-deferred. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). The analysis was carried ou</pubmed_abstract><journal>Reviews in cardiovascular medicine</journal><pagination>62</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11273154</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Clinical Outcome of FFR-Guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions: The HALE-BOPP Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11273154</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tedeschi D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cortese B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pompei G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibiino F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Durante A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ielasi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arena M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marrone A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barbato E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watkins S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scala A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tebaldi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pavasini R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Serenelli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caglioni S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scollo E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Biscaglia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mele D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verdoliva S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scoccia A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Aniello E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valentini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bilotta F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical Outcome of FFR-Guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions: The HALE-BOPP Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recently, questions around the efficacy and effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) have arisen in various clinical settings.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The Clinical Outcome of FFR-guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions (HALE-BOPP) study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international prospective study enrolling patients who underwent FFR measurement on at least one vessel. In accordance with the decision-making workflow and treatment, the vessels were classified in three subgroups: (i) angio-revascularized, (ii) FFR-revascularized, (iii) FFR-deferred. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). The analysis was carried ou</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2026-04-08T15:25:15.061Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T04:31:19.376Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11273154</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39077421</pubmed><doi>10.31083/j.rcm2402062</doi></cross_references></HashMap>